Literature DB >> 12219261

[The reproducibility of multifocal ERG recordings].

T Meigen1, A Friedrich.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: Multifocal electroretinogram recordings (mfERG) can be used to detect a local dysfunction of the retina. In this study we tested both the intrasessional and inter-sessional reproducibility of mfERG amplitudes.
METHODS: MfERGs from 6 eyes of 6 normal subjects were recorded on two different days using DTL electrodes. The relative coefficient of variation ( RCV) was used to quantify the amplitude reproducibility. We tested the effect of (a) session (inter- vs. intrasessional), (b) recording duration (7.3 vs. 3.6 min), (c) trace type (hexagon traces vs. ring averages), and (d) amplitude definition (peak-trough analysis vs. scalar product) on RCV.
RESULTS: RCV was 6.5+/-0.4% (Mean+/-SEM, n=96) when averaged across all recording conditions and all subjects. The ANOVA showed a significant difference ( p=0.018) between hexagon traces and ring averages. Another significant effect ( p=0.016) occurred for the interaction of (a) and (b).
CONCLUSION: MfERGs can be recorded with a high degree of reproducibility even for short recording durations and single hexagon traces. As the factor (a) did not show a significant effect, the new placement of the DTL electrode in the second session does not necessarily increase the retest variability compared to a second recording within the same session.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12219261     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-002-0630-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  4 in total

1.  Intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Fatih C Gundogan; Gungor Sobaci; Mehmet Z Bayraktar
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The effect of nutritional supplementation on the multifocal electroretinogram in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Emma J Berrow; Hannah E Bartlett; Frank Eperjesi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Reproducibility of the mfERG between instruments.

Authors:  Wendy W Harrison; Marcus A Bearse; Jason S Ng; Shirin Barez; Marilyn E Schneck; Anthony J Adams
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.