T Meigen1, A Friedrich. 1. Universitäts-Augenklinik Würzburg. t.meigen@augenklinik.uni-wuerzburg.de
Abstract
PROBLEM: Multifocal electroretinogram recordings (mfERG) can be used to detect a local dysfunction of the retina. In this study we tested both the intrasessional and inter-sessional reproducibility of mfERG amplitudes. METHODS: MfERGs from 6 eyes of 6 normal subjects were recorded on two different days using DTL electrodes. The relative coefficient of variation ( RCV) was used to quantify the amplitude reproducibility. We tested the effect of (a) session (inter- vs. intrasessional), (b) recording duration (7.3 vs. 3.6 min), (c) trace type (hexagon traces vs. ring averages), and (d) amplitude definition (peak-trough analysis vs. scalar product) on RCV. RESULTS: RCV was 6.5+/-0.4% (Mean+/-SEM, n=96) when averaged across all recording conditions and all subjects. The ANOVA showed a significant difference ( p=0.018) between hexagon traces and ring averages. Another significant effect ( p=0.016) occurred for the interaction of (a) and (b). CONCLUSION: MfERGs can be recorded with a high degree of reproducibility even for short recording durations and single hexagon traces. As the factor (a) did not show a significant effect, the new placement of the DTL electrode in the second session does not necessarily increase the retest variability compared to a second recording within the same session.
PROBLEM: Multifocal electroretinogram recordings (mfERG) can be used to detect a local dysfunction of the retina. In this study we tested both the intrasessional and inter-sessional reproducibility of mfERG amplitudes. METHODS: MfERGs from 6 eyes of 6 normal subjects were recorded on two different days using DTL electrodes. The relative coefficient of variation ( RCV) was used to quantify the amplitude reproducibility. We tested the effect of (a) session (inter- vs. intrasessional), (b) recording duration (7.3 vs. 3.6 min), (c) trace type (hexagon traces vs. ring averages), and (d) amplitude definition (peak-trough analysis vs. scalar product) on RCV. RESULTS: RCV was 6.5+/-0.4% (Mean+/-SEM, n=96) when averaged across all recording conditions and all subjects. The ANOVA showed a significant difference ( p=0.018) between hexagon traces and ring averages. Another significant effect ( p=0.016) occurred for the interaction of (a) and (b). CONCLUSION: MfERGs can be recorded with a high degree of reproducibility even for short recording durations and single hexagon traces. As the factor (a) did not show a significant effect, the new placement of the DTL electrode in the second session does not necessarily increase the retest variability compared to a second recording within the same session.
Authors: Wendy W Harrison; Marcus A Bearse; Jason S Ng; Shirin Barez; Marilyn E Schneck; Anthony J Adams Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2009-03-26 Impact factor: 2.379