Literature DB >> 9619027

[Reproducibility and wave analysis of multifocal electroretinography].

K Aoyagi1, Y Kimura, H Isono, H Akiyama, T Sugawara.   

Abstract

We studied the reproducibility of multifocal electroretinography by repeated measurements in normal subjects. We also analyzed the amplitude and implicit time of the waves. Nine healthy eyes including myopic cases (-4.1 D on average) of 9 normal males, aged 19 to 42 years, were the objects of study. We used a (Visual Evoked Response Imaging System III (VERIS III), by TOMEY Corp.) for multifocal electroretinography. Each eye was examined 4 times on different days. The stimulus elements consisted of 103 hexagons. The net recording time was 4 minutes. We used the coefficient of variation (standard deviation/average) of 4 measurements of response density as index of reproducibility. Poor fixation and blinking were important factors that affected the reproducibility. In all the 9 eyes, reproducibility of multifocal electroretinography, expressed as average of the coefficient of variation of all regions, was 22% on average. In 6 eyes with good fixation and without blinking, the reproducibility was 15% on average. In 6 eyes with good reproducibility, we analyzed three parameters of the focal response waves: all traces, quadrants and rings, as well as the amplitude and latency of the waves. These data served as controls. Our studies showed that the response density correlated closely with the amplitude and not with the latency in normal subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9619027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi        ISSN: 0029-0203


  4 in total

1.  Intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Fatih C Gundogan; Gungor Sobaci; Mehmet Z Bayraktar
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Test-retest reliability of the multifocal electroretinogram and humphrey visual fields in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  William Seiple; Colleen J Clemens; Vivienne C Greenstein; Ronald E Carr; Karen Holopigian
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Influence of cataract on the multifocal ERG recording--a pre- and postoperative comparison.

Authors:  Ursula V Wördehoff; Anja M Palmowski; Bernhild Heinemann-Vernaleken; Reiner Allgayer; Klaus W Ruprecht
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Relative sensitivity and specificity of 10-2 visual fields, multifocal electroretinography, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in detecting hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine retinopathy.

Authors:  David J Browning; Chong Lee
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.