Literature DB >> 20410360

Population response profiles in early visual cortex are biased in favor of more valuable stimuli.

John T Serences1, Sameer Saproo.   

Abstract

Voluntary and stimulus-driven shifts of attention can modulate the representation of behaviorally relevant stimuli in early areas of visual cortex. In turn, attended items are processed faster and more accurately, facilitating the selection of appropriate behavioral responses. Information processing is also strongly influenced by past experience and recent studies indicate that the learned value of a stimulus can influence relatively late stages of decision making such as the process of selecting a motor response. However, the learned value of a stimulus can also influence the magnitude of cortical responses in early sensory areas such as V1 and S1. These early effects of stimulus value are presumed to improve the quality of sensory representations; however, the nature of these modulations is not clear. They could reflect nonspecific changes in response amplitude associated with changes in general arousal or they could reflect a bias in population responses so that high-value features are represented more robustly. To examine this issue, subjects performed a two-alternative forced choice paradigm with a variable-interval payoff schedule to dynamically manipulate the relative value of two stimuli defined by their orientation (one was rotated clockwise from vertical, the other counterclockwise). Activation levels in visual cortex were monitored using functional MRI and feature-selective voxel tuning functions while subjects performed the behavioral task. The results suggest that value not only modulates the relative amplitude of responses in early areas of human visual cortex, but also sharpens the response profile across the populations of feature-selective neurons that encode the critical stimulus feature (orientation). Moreover, changes in space- or feature-based attention cannot easily explain the results because representations of both the selected and the unselected stimuli underwent a similar feature-selective modulation. This sharpening in the population response profile could theoretically improve the probability of correctly discriminating high-value stimuli from low-value alternatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20410360      PMCID: PMC2904226          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01090.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  97 in total

1.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Reward modulation of prefrontal and visual association cortex during an incentive working memory task.

Authors:  Daniel C Krawczyk; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Estimating the influence of attention on population codes in human visual cortex using voxel-based tuning functions.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo; Miranda Scolari; Tiffany Ho; L Tugan Muftuler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

7.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  On the origin of cortical dopamine: is it a co-transmitter in noradrenergic neurons?

Authors:  Paola Devoto; Giovanna Flore
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.363

10.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Thomas Naselaris; Ryan J Prenger; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  43 in total

1.  Priming by motivationally salient distractors produces hemispheric asymmetries in visual processing.

Authors:  Rashmi Gupta; Jane E Raymond; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-24

2.  Reward and attentional control in visual search.

Authors:  Steven Yantis; Brian A Anderson; Emma K Wampler; Patryk A Laurent
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

3.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Theta Oscillations in Visual Cortex Emerge with Experience to Convey Expected Reward Time and Experienced Reward Rate.

Authors:  Camila L Zold; Marshall G Hussain Shuler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim; Mark K Britton; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-06-12

6.  Sodium concentration coding gives way to evaluative coding in cortex and amygdala.

Authors:  Brian F Sadacca; Jason T Rothwax; Donald B Katz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Effects of task and attentional selection on responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Erik Runeson; Geoffrey M Boynton; Scott O Murray
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  A unified selection signal for attention and reward in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Liviu Stănişor; Chris van der Togt; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.