Literature DB >> 18313072

Thermodynamic dissection of progesterone receptor interactions at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter: monomer binding and strong cooperativity dominate the assembly reaction.

Keith D Connaghan-Jones1, Aaron F Heneghan, Michael T Miura, David L Bain.   

Abstract

Progesterone receptors (PRs) play critical roles in eukaryotic gene regulation, yet the mechanisms by which they assemble at their promoters are poorly understood. One of the few promoters amenable to analysis is the mouse mammary tumor virus gene regulatory sequence. Embedded within this sequence are four progesterone response elements (PREs) corresponding to a palindromic PRE and three half-site PREs. Early mutational studies indicated that the presence of all four sites generated a synergistic and strong transcriptional response. However, DNA binding analyses suggested that receptor assembly at the promoter occurred in the absence of significant cooperativity. Taken together, the results indicated that cooperative interactions among PREs could not account for the observed functional synergy. More broadly, the studies raised the question of whether cooperativity was a common feature of PR-mediated gene regulation. As a step toward obtaining a quantitative and, thus, predictive understanding of receptor function, we have carried out a thermodynamic dissection of PR A-isoform interactions at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Utilizing analytical ultracentrifugation and quantitative footprinting, we have resolved the microscopic energetics of PR A-isoform binding, including cooperativity terms. Our results reveal a model contrary to that inferred from previous biochemical investigations. Specifically, the binding unit at a half-site is not a receptor dimer but is instead a monomer; monomers bound at half-sites are capable of significant pairwise cooperative interactions; occupancy of all three half-sites is required to cooperatively engage the palindromic-bound dimer; and finally, large unfavorable forces accompany assembly. Overall, monomer binding accounts for the majority of the intrinsic binding energetics and cooperativity contributes an approximately 1000-fold increase in receptor-promoter stability. Finally, the partitioning of cooperativity suggests a framework for interpreting in vivo transcriptional synergy. These results highlight the insight available from rigorous analysis and demonstrate that receptor-promoter interactions are considerably more complex than typically envisioned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18313072      PMCID: PMC2723828          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  36 in total

1.  Thermodynamic analysis of progesterone receptor-promoter interactions reveals a molecular model for isoform-specific function.

Authors:  Keith D Connaghan-Jones; Aaron F Heneghan; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cooperative DNA binding by the B-isoform of human progesterone receptor: thermodynamic analysis reveals strongly favorable and unfavorable contributions to assembly.

Authors:  Aaron F Heneghan; Keith D Connaghan-Jones; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  An N-terminal inhibitory function, IF, suppresses transcription by the A-isoform but not the B-isoform of human progesterone receptors.

Authors:  A R Hovland; R L Powell; G S Takimoto; L Tung; K B Horwitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-03-06       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Progesterone receptor-induced bending of its target DNA: distinct effects of the A and B receptor forms.

Authors:  P Prendergast; Z Pan; D P Edwards
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1996-04

5.  Self-association energetics of an intact, full-length nuclear receptor: the B-isoform of human progesterone receptor dimerizes in the micromolar range.

Authors:  Aaron F Heneghan; Nancy Berton; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Progesterone receptors (PR)-B and -A regulate transcription by different mechanisms: AF-3 exerts regulatory control over coactivator binding to PR-B.

Authors:  Lin Tung; Hany Abdel-Hafiz; Tianjie Shen; Djuana M E Harvell; Lisa K Nitao; Jennifer K Richer; Carol A Sartorius; Glenn S Takimoto; Kathryn B Horwitz
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2006-06-08

Review 7.  Chromatin remodeling and control of cell proliferation by progestins via cross talk of progesterone receptor with the estrogen receptors and kinase signaling pathways.

Authors:  Guillermo P Vicent; Cecilia Ballaré; Roser Zaurin; Patricia Saragüeta; Miguel Beato
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Hydrodynamic analysis of the human progesterone receptor A-isoform reveals that self-association occurs in the micromolar range.

Authors:  Keith D Connaghan-Jones; Aaron F Heneghan; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  A third transactivation function (AF3) of human progesterone receptors located in the unique N-terminal segment of the B-isoform.

Authors:  C A Sartorius; M Y Melville; A R Hovland; L Tung; G S Takimoto; K B Horwitz
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1994-10

10.  Coactivator assembly at the promoter: efficient recruitment of SRC2 is coupled to cooperative DNA binding by the progesterone receptor.

Authors:  Aaron F Heneghan; Keith D Connaghan-Jones; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  14 in total

1.  A theoretical framework for gene induction and experimental comparisons.

Authors:  Karen M Ong; John A Blackford; Benjamin L Kagan; S Stoney Simons; Carson C Chow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Progesterone receptors, their isoforms and progesterone regulated transcription.

Authors:  Britta M Jacobsen; Kathryn B Horwitz
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.102

3.  Na(+) and K(+) allosterically regulate cooperative DNA binding by the human progesterone receptor.

Authors:  Keith D Connaghan; Aaron F Heneghan; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Thermodynamic dissection of estrogen receptor-promoter interactions reveals that steroid receptors differentially partition their self-association and promoter binding energetics.

Authors:  Amie D Moody; Michael T Miura; Keith D Connaghan; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  Structural and functional analysis of domains of the progesterone receptor.

Authors:  Krista K Hill; Sarah C Roemer; Mair E A Churchill; Dean P Edwards
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 6.  From steroid receptors to cytokines: the thermodynamics of self-associating systems.

Authors:  Keith D Connaghan; Amie D Moody; James P Robblee; James R Lambert; David L Bain
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Control of endothelin-a receptor expression by progesterone is enhanced by synergy with Gata2.

Authors:  Yanping Zhang; Gregory R Knutsen; Matthew D Brown; L Bruno Ruest
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-04-16

8.  ALU repeats in promoters are position-dependent co-response elements (coRE) that enhance or repress transcription by dimeric and monomeric progesterone receptors.

Authors:  Britta M Jacobsen; Purevsuren Jambal; Stephanie A Schittone; Kathryn B Horwitz
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-04-16

9.  Dissection of androgen receptor-promoter interactions: steroid receptors partition their interaction energetics in parallel with their phylogenetic divergence.

Authors:  Rolando W De Angelis; Qin Yang; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Glucocorticoid receptor-promoter interactions: energetic dissection suggests a framework for the specificity of steroid receptor-mediated gene regulation.

Authors:  James P Robblee; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.