Literature DB >> 20351279

A theoretical framework for gene induction and experimental comparisons.

Karen M Ong1, John A Blackford, Benjamin L Kagan, S Stoney Simons, Carson C Chow.   

Abstract

Ligand-mediated gene induction by steroid receptors is a multistep process characterized by a dose-response curve for gene product that follows a first-order Hill equation. This behavior has classically been explained by steroid binding to receptor being the rate-limiting step. However, this predicts a constant potency of gene induction (EC(50)) for a given receptor-steroid complex, which is challenged by the findings that various cofactors/reagents can alter this parameter in a gene-specific manner. These properties put strong constraints on the mechanisms of gene induction and raise two questions: How can a first-order Hill dose-response curve (FHDC) arise from a multistep reaction sequence, and how do cofactors modify potency? Here we introduce a theoretical framework in which a sequence of steps yields an FHDC for the final product as a function of the initial agonist concentration. An exact determination of all constants is not required to describe the final FHDC. The theory predicts mechanisms for cofactor/reagent effects on gene-induction potency and maximal activity and it assigns a relative order to cofactors in the sequence of steps. The theory is supported by several observations from glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene induction. It identifies the mechanism and matches the measured dose-response curves for different concentrations of the combination of cofactor Ubc9 and receptor. It also predicts that an FHDC cannot involve the DNA binding of preformed receptor dimers, which is validated experimentally. The theory is general and can be applied to any biochemical reaction that shows an FHDC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20351279      PMCID: PMC2872427          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911095107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

Review 1.  Morphogen gradient interpretation.

Authors:  J B Gurdon; P Y Bourillot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Transactivation specificity of glucocorticoid versus progesterone receptors. Role of functionally different interactions of transcription factors with amino- and carboxyl-terminal receptor domains.

Authors:  L N Song; B Huse; S Rusconi; S S Simons
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Opposing effects of corepressor and coactivators in determining the dose-response curve of agonists, and residual agonist activity of antagonists, for glucocorticoid receptor-regulated gene expression.

Authors:  D Szapary; Y Huang; S S Simons
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1999-12

4.  Thermodynamic dissection of progesterone receptor interactions at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter: monomer binding and strong cooperativity dominate the assembly reaction.

Authors:  Keith D Connaghan-Jones; Aaron F Heneghan; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Ubc9 is a novel modulator of the induction properties of glucocorticoid receptors.

Authors:  Sunil Kaul; John A Blackford; Sehyung Cho; S Stoney Simons
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Modulation of RNA polymerase assembly dynamics in transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Stanislaw A Gorski; Sara K Snyder; Sam John; Ingrid Grummt; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Properties of the glucocorticoid modulatory element binding proteins GMEB-1 and -2: potential new modifiers of glucocorticoid receptor transactivation and members of the family of KDWK proteins.

Authors:  S Kaul; J A Blackford; J Chen; V V Ogryzko; S S Simons
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2000-07

8.  Mice with an increased glucocorticoid receptor gene dosage show enhanced resistance to stress and endotoxic shock.

Authors:  H M Reichardt; T Umland; A Bauer; O Kretz; G Schütz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  The importance of being varied in steroid receptor transactivation.

Authors:  S Stoney Simons
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 14.819

10.  Crystal structure of the glucocorticoid receptor ligand binding domain reveals a novel mode of receptor dimerization and coactivator recognition.

Authors:  Randy K Bledsoe; Valerie G Montana; Thomas B Stanley; Chris J Delves; Christopher J Apolito; David D McKee; Thomas G Consler; Derek J Parks; Eugene L Stewart; Timothy M Willson; Millard H Lambert; John T Moore; Kenneth H Pearce; H Eric Xu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  34 in total

1.  Inferring mechanisms from dose-response curves.

Authors:  Carson C Chow; Karen M Ong; Edward J Dougherty; S Stoney Simons
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Minireview: dynamic structures of nuclear hormone receptors: new promises and challenges.

Authors:  S Stoney Simons; Dean P Edwards; Raj Kumar
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-11-27

3.  Research resource: modulators of glucocorticoid receptor activity identified by a new high-throughput screening assay.

Authors:  John A Blackford; Kyle R Brimacombe; Edward J Dougherty; Madhumita Pradhan; Min Shen; Zhuyin Li; Douglas S Auld; Carson C Chow; Christopher P Austin; S Stoney Simons
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-05-21

4.  Structural conditions on complex networks for the Michaelis-Menten input-output response.

Authors:  Felix Wong; Annwesha Dutta; Debashish Chowdhury; Jeremy Gunawardena
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The hypersensitive glucocorticoid response specifically regulates period 1 and expression of circadian genes.

Authors:  Timothy E Reddy; Jason Gertz; Gregory E Crawford; Michael J Garabedian; Richard M Myers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Quantitative analysis of the bidirectional viral G-protein-coupled receptor and lytic latency-associated nuclear antigen promoter of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus.

Authors:  Isaac B Hilton; Dirk P Dittmer
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Identification of location and kinetically defined mechanism of cofactors and reporter genes in the cascade of steroid-regulated transactivation.

Authors:  John A Blackford; Chunhua Guo; Rong Zhu; Edward J Dougherty; Carson C Chow; S Stoney Simons
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Separate regions of glucocorticoid receptor, coactivator TIF2, and comodulator STAMP modify different parameters of glucocorticoid-mediated gene induction.

Authors:  Smita Awasthi; S Stoney Simons
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 9.  What do expression dynamics tell us about the mechanism of transcription?

Authors:  Daniel R Larson
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 5.578

10.  A conserved protein motif is required for full modulatory activity of negative elongation factor subunits NELF-A and NELF-B in modifying glucocorticoid receptor-regulated gene induction properties.

Authors:  Min Luo; Xinping Lu; Rong Zhu; Zhenhuan Zhang; Carson C Chow; Rong Li; S Stoney Simons
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.