Literature DB >> 22201220

Thermodynamic dissection of estrogen receptor-promoter interactions reveals that steroid receptors differentially partition their self-association and promoter binding energetics.

Amie D Moody1, Michael T Miura, Keith D Connaghan, David L Bain.   

Abstract

Steroid receptors define a family of ligand-activated transcription factors. Recent work has demonstrated that the receptors regulate distinct but overlapping gene networks, yet the mechanisms by which they do so remain unclear. We previously determined the microscopic binding energetics for progesterone receptor (PR) isoform assembly at promoters containing multiple response elements. We found that the two isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) share nearly identical dimerization and intrinsic DNA binding free energies but maintain large differences in cooperative free energy. Moreover, cooperativity can be modulated by monovalent ion binding and promoter layout, suggesting that differences in cooperativity might control isoform-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor function. To determine whether cooperative binding energetics are common to other members of the steroid receptor family, we dissected the thermodynamics of estrogen receptor-α (ER-α):promoter interactions. We find that the ER-α intrinsic DNA binding free energy is identical to that of the PR isoforms. This was expected, noting that receptor DNA binding domains are highly conserved. Unexpectedly, ER-α generates negligible cooperativity-orders of magnitude less than predicted based on our studies of the PR isoforms. However, analysis of the cooperativity term suggests that it reflects a balance between highly favorable cooperative stabilization and unfavorable promoter bending. Moreover, ER-α cooperative free energy is compensated for by a large increase in dimerization free energy. Collectively, the results demonstrate that steroid receptors differentially partition not only cooperative energetics but also dimerization energetics. We speculate that this ability serves as a framework for regulating receptor-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor-specific gene regulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22201220      PMCID: PMC3535315          DOI: 10.1021/bi2017156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  37 in total

1.  Monte Carlo method for determining complete confidence probability distributions of estimated model parameters.

Authors:  M Straume; M L Johnson
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Comparison of operator-specific and nonspecific DNA binding of the lambda cI repressor: [KCl] and pH effects.

Authors:  D F Senear; R Batey
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-07-09       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data.

Authors:  S C Gill; P H von Hippel
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Quantitative DNase footprint titration: a method for studying protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  M Brenowitz; D F Senear; M A Shea; G K Ackers
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Luciferase reporter gene vectors for analysis of promoters and enhancers.

Authors:  S K Nordeen
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.993

6.  Hormone- and DNA-binding mechanisms of the recombinant human estrogen receptor.

Authors:  J D Obourn; N J Koszewski; A C Notides
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-06-22       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  The DNA binding domain and bending angle of E. coli CAP protein.

Authors:  H N Liu-Johnson; M R Gartenberg; D M Crothers
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-12-26       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Characterization of the calf uterine progesterone receptor and its stabilization by nucleic acids.

Authors:  G Theofan; A C Notides
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.736

9.  Cooperative binding of estrogen receptor to imperfect estrogen-responsive DNA elements correlates with their synergistic hormone-dependent enhancer activity.

Authors:  E Martinez; W Wahli
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Synergistic activation of transcription by the human estrogen receptor bound to tandem responsive elements.

Authors:  M Ponglikitmongkol; J H White; P Chambon
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  Analysis of a glucocorticoid-estrogen receptor chimera reveals that dimerization energetics are under ionic control.

Authors:  Keith D Connaghan; Michael T Miura; Nasib K Maluf; James R Lambert; David L Bain
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Dissection of androgen receptor-promoter interactions: steroid receptors partition their interaction energetics in parallel with their phylogenetic divergence.

Authors:  Rolando W De Angelis; Qin Yang; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Glucocorticoid receptor-promoter interactions: energetic dissection suggests a framework for the specificity of steroid receptor-mediated gene regulation.

Authors:  James P Robblee; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  A hydrophobic ratchet entrenches molecular complexes.

Authors:  Georg K A Hochberg; Yang Liu; Erik G Marklund; Brian P H Metzger; Arthur Laganowsky; Joseph W Thornton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Steroid receptor-DNA interactions: toward a quantitative connection between energetics and transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  David L Bain; Keith D Connaghan; Nasib K Maluf; Qin Yang; Michael T Miura; Rolando W De Angelis; Gregory D Degala; James R Lambert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.