Literature DB >> 17277083

Thermodynamic analysis of progesterone receptor-promoter interactions reveals a molecular model for isoform-specific function.

Keith D Connaghan-Jones1, Aaron F Heneghan, Michael T Miura, David L Bain.   

Abstract

Human progesterone receptors (PR) exist as two functionally distinct isoforms, PR-A and PR-B. The proteins are identical except for an additional 164 residues located at the N terminus of PR-B. To determine the mechanisms responsible for isoform-specific functional differences, we present here a thermodynamic dissection of PR-A-promoter interactions and compare the results to our previous work on PR-B. This analysis has generated a number of results inconsistent with the traditional, biochemically based model of receptor function. Specifically, statistical models invoking preformed PR-A dimers as the active binding species demonstrate that intrinsic binding energetics are over an order of magnitude greater than is apparent. High-affinity binding is opposed, however, by a large energetic penalty. The consequences of this penalty are 2-fold: Successive monomer binding to a palindromic response element is thermodynamically favored over preformed dimer binding, and DNA-induced dimerization of the monomers is largely abolished. Furthermore, PR-A binding to multiple PREs is only weakly cooperative, as judged by a 5-fold increase in overall stability. Comparison of these results to our work on PR-B demonstrates that whereas both isoforms appear to have similar DNA binding affinities, PR-B in fact has a greatly increased intrinsic binding affinity and cooperative binding ability relative to PR-A. These differences thus suggest that residues unique to PR-B allosterically regulate the energetics of cooperative promoter assembly. From a functional perspective, the differences in microscopic affinities predict receptor-promoter occupancies that accurately correlate with the transcriptional activation profiles seen for each isoform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17277083      PMCID: PMC1892943          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0608848104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  Cooperative DNA binding by the B-isoform of human progesterone receptor: thermodynamic analysis reveals strongly favorable and unfavorable contributions to assembly.

Authors:  Aaron F Heneghan; Keith D Connaghan-Jones; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  Analysis of protein and DNA-mediated contributions to cooperative assembly of protein-DNA complexes.

Authors:  D F Senear; J B Ross; T M Laue
Journal:  Methods       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Progesterone receptor-induced bending of its target DNA: distinct effects of the A and B receptor forms.

Authors:  P Prendergast; Z Pan; D P Edwards
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1996-04

4.  Self-association energetics of an intact, full-length nuclear receptor: the B-isoform of human progesterone receptor dimerizes in the micromolar range.

Authors:  Aaron F Heneghan; Nancy Berton; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  DNA bending is induced by binding of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain and progesterone receptors to their response element.

Authors:  L N Petz; A M Nardulli; J Kim; K B Horwitz; L P Freedman; D J Shapiro
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.292

6.  Structure of the progesterone receptor-deoxyribonucleic acid complex: novel interactions required for binding to half-site response elements.

Authors:  Sarah C Roemer; Douglas C Donham; Lori Sherman; Vickie H Pon; Dean P Edwards; Mair E A Churchill
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2006-08-24

7.  Intra-domain communication between the N-terminal and DNA-binding domains of the androgen receptor: modulation of androgen response element DNA binding.

Authors:  Jacqueline Brodie; Iain J McEwan
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.098

8.  A third transactivation function (AF3) of human progesterone receptors located in the unique N-terminal segment of the B-isoform.

Authors:  C A Sartorius; M Y Melville; A R Hovland; L Tung; G S Takimoto; K B Horwitz
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1994-10

9.  The leucine zippers of c-fos and c-jun for progesterone receptor dimerization: A-dominance in the A/B heterodimer.

Authors:  M K Mohamed; L Tung; G S Takimoto; K B Horwitz
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.292

10.  Characterization of progesterone receptor A and B expression in human breast cancer.

Authors:  J D Graham; C Yeates; R L Balleine; S S Harvey; J S Milliken; A M Bilous; C L Clarke
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  17 in total

1.  Thermodynamic dissection of progesterone receptor interactions at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter: monomer binding and strong cooperativity dominate the assembly reaction.

Authors:  Keith D Connaghan-Jones; Aaron F Heneghan; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Mechanism of strand-specific smooth muscle alpha-actin enhancer interaction by purine-rich element binding protein B (Purbeta).

Authors:  Jon E Ramsey; Robert J Kelm
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Allosteric pathways in nuclear receptors - Potential targets for drug design.

Authors:  Elias J Fernandez
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Na(+) and K(+) allosterically regulate cooperative DNA binding by the human progesterone receptor.

Authors:  Keith D Connaghan; Aaron F Heneghan; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Thermodynamic dissection of estrogen receptor-promoter interactions reveals that steroid receptors differentially partition their self-association and promoter binding energetics.

Authors:  Amie D Moody; Michael T Miura; Keith D Connaghan; David L Bain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 6.  Structural and functional analysis of domains of the progesterone receptor.

Authors:  Krista K Hill; Sarah C Roemer; Mair E A Churchill; Dean P Edwards
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 7.  From steroid receptors to cytokines: the thermodynamics of self-associating systems.

Authors:  Keith D Connaghan; Amie D Moody; James P Robblee; James R Lambert; David L Bain
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Analysis of a glucocorticoid-estrogen receptor chimera reveals that dimerization energetics are under ionic control.

Authors:  Keith D Connaghan; Michael T Miura; Nasib K Maluf; James R Lambert; David L Bain
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  ALU repeats in promoters are position-dependent co-response elements (coRE) that enhance or repress transcription by dimeric and monomeric progesterone receptors.

Authors:  Britta M Jacobsen; Purevsuren Jambal; Stephanie A Schittone; Kathryn B Horwitz
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-04-16

10.  Dissection of androgen receptor-promoter interactions: steroid receptors partition their interaction energetics in parallel with their phylogenetic divergence.

Authors:  Rolando W De Angelis; Qin Yang; Michael T Miura; David L Bain
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.