Literature DB >> 15654225

Adjusting the estimated proportion of breast cancer cases associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: public health implications.

Monica R McClain1, Glenn E Palomaki, Katherine L Nathanson, James E Haddow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes increase breast cancer risk. Assuring reliability of information about these mutations is increasingly important to the health care community; mutation testing is becoming more widespread. We describe a methodology for assessing such information.
METHODS: Our approach integrates four interdependent epidemiologic parameters: (1) the probability of developing breast cancer, (2) the proportion of breast cancer cases with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, (3) the proportion of women that carries a mutation, and (4) the proportion of women with a mutation that develops cancer. We assess the plausibility of estimates of these parameters from published reports and commonly accessed information sources.
RESULTS: Assuming a fixed probability of developing breast cancer, the following estimates for the other three epidemiologic parameters are derived for women by age 70: 1% to 2% of all breast cancer cases are associated with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation; 1 in 300 to 1 in 465 women carry a mutation; and 35 to 65% of mutation carriers develop breast cancer. Within these ranges, however, only selected combinations are plausible. The proportion of mutation-related breast cancer is lower than listed in some common information sources (1 to 2% vs 6%). Also, penetrance is somewhat lower and the carrier rate somewhat higher.
CONCLUSIONS: The four epidemiologic parameters can be integrated to test their plausibility. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are associated with only one-third as many breast cancer cases in the general population as reported by commonly accessed information sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15654225     DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000151155.36470.ff

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  22 in total

1.  A misquoted mutation in exon16 of the BRCA2 gene.

Authors:  Agapi Kataki; Anastasia Derventzi; Ilias Gomatos; Manoussos M Konstadoulakis
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 2.  The challenge of developing evidence-based genetics health care in practice.

Authors:  Brenda J Wilson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Screen positive rates among six family history screening protocols for breast/ovarian cancer in four cohorts of women.

Authors:  Monica R McClain; Glenn E Palomaki; Heather Hampel; Judith A Westman; James E Haddow
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Rapid and cost-effective high-throughput sequencing for identification of germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Somayeh Ahmadloo; Hirofumi Nakaoka; Takahide Hayano; Kazuyoshi Hosomichi; Hua You; Emi Utsuno; Takafumi Sangai; Motoi Nishimura; Kazuyuki Matsushita; Akira Hata; Fumio Nomura; Ituro Inoue
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew B Yurgelun; Matthew H Kulke; Charles S Fuchs; Brian A Allen; Hajime Uno; Jason L Hornick; Chinedu I Ukaegbu; Lauren K Brais; Philip G McNamara; Robert J Mayer; Deborah Schrag; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Kimmie Ng; John Kidd; Nanda Singh; Anne-Renee Hartman; Richard J Wenstrup; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Identification of a Variety of Mutations in Cancer Predisposition Genes in Patients With Suspected Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Matthew B Yurgelun; Brian Allen; Rajesh R Kaldate; Karla R Bowles; Thaddeus Judkins; Praveen Kaushik; Benjamin B Roa; Richard J Wenstrup; Anne-Renee Hartman; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Too many referrals of low-risk women for BRCA1/2 genetic services by family physicians.

Authors:  Della Brown White; Vence L Bonham; Jean Jenkins; Nancy Stevens; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Cancer prevention and screening practices among women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer after genetic counseling in the community setting.

Authors:  Debra Morgan; Heather Sylvester; F Lee Lucas; Susan Miesfeldt
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Advances in Hereditary Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Katharine A Germansky; Matthew B Yurgelun
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  African American women's limited knowledge and experiences with genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Vanessa B Sheppard; Kristi D Graves; Juleen Christopher; Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Costellia Talley; Karen Patricia Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.