Literature DB >> 10538645

Acceptability of computer assessments among ethnically diverse, low-income smokers.

B Bock1, R Niaura, A Fontes, F Bock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the acceptability of computer-based assessments among an ethnically diverse, low-income population of primary care patients. Although computers have been used to provide assessments and interventions in health care settings, members of ethnic minority and low-income households have less access to computers than other groups, and therefore the acceptability of computers as a health care assessment and delivery tool needs to be examined.
DESIGN: We examined the acceptability of computers for providing assessments of smoking history, nicotine dependence, and other related variables among an ethnically diverse, low-income primary care population. No intervention was used in this study.
SETTING: Three inner-city primary care clinics located in hospitals were used as sites for this study. These hospitals were located in areas of the city where low-income and ethnic minority households are overrepresented relative to the total population.
SUBJECTS: Adult male and female smokers (n = 522) were recruited while awaiting appointments in each primary care clinic. MEASURES: A questionnaire assessing smoking rate, patterns, history, motivation to quit smoking, and other smoking-related variables was administered using either a paper-and-pencil format or a laptop computer.
RESULTS: Frequency counts, analysis of variance, and chi 2 tests were used where appropriate. Most subjects (78.5%) used the computer to complete the baseline survey. Almost all subjects (92%) rated the computer "very easy" or "easy" to use. Subjects who were Spanish-speaking, were born outside the United States, or were Hispanic tended to rate the program as slightly less easy to use than other subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-based assessments appear highly acceptable to individuals in low-income populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10538645     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.5.299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  6 in total

Review 1.  Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use.

Authors:  Michael J Stirratt; Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob; Heidi M Crane; Jane M Simoni; Susan Czajkowski; Marisa E Hilliard; James E Aikens; Christine M Hunter; Dawn I Velligan; Kristen Huntley; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Cynthia S Rand; Eleanor Schron; Wendy J Nilsen
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Screen positive rates among six family history screening protocols for breast/ovarian cancer in four cohorts of women.

Authors:  Monica R McClain; Glenn E Palomaki; Heather Hampel; Judith A Westman; James E Haddow
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Exploring patient reactions to pen-tablet computers: a report from CaReNet.

Authors:  Deborah S Main; Javan Quintela; Rodrigo Araya-Guerra; Sherry Holcomb; Wilson D Pace
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Patient difficulty using tablet computers to screen in primary care.

Authors:  Rachel Hess; Aimee Santucci; Kathleen McTigue; Gary Fischer; Wishwa Kapoor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A tailored intervention to support pharmacy-based counseling for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Beth C Bock; Karen S Hudmon; James Christian; Amanda L Graham; Frederick R Bock
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Assessing smoking status in disadvantaged populations: is computer administered self report an accurate and acceptable measure?

Authors:  Jamie Bryant; Billie Bonevski; Christine Paul; Christophe Lecathelinais
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.