B Bock1, R Niaura, A Fontes, F Bock. 1. Miriam Hospital Center for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the acceptability of computer-based assessments among an ethnically diverse, low-income population of primary care patients. Although computers have been used to provide assessments and interventions in health care settings, members of ethnic minority and low-income households have less access to computers than other groups, and therefore the acceptability of computers as a health care assessment and delivery tool needs to be examined. DESIGN: We examined the acceptability of computers for providing assessments of smoking history, nicotine dependence, and other related variables among an ethnically diverse, low-income primary care population. No intervention was used in this study. SETTING: Three inner-city primary care clinics located in hospitals were used as sites for this study. These hospitals were located in areas of the city where low-income and ethnic minority households are overrepresented relative to the total population. SUBJECTS: Adult male and female smokers (n = 522) were recruited while awaiting appointments in each primary care clinic. MEASURES: A questionnaire assessing smoking rate, patterns, history, motivation to quit smoking, and other smoking-related variables was administered using either a paper-and-pencil format or a laptop computer. RESULTS: Frequency counts, analysis of variance, and chi 2 tests were used where appropriate. Most subjects (78.5%) used the computer to complete the baseline survey. Almost all subjects (92%) rated the computer "very easy" or "easy" to use. Subjects who were Spanish-speaking, were born outside the United States, or were Hispanic tended to rate the program as slightly less easy to use than other subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-based assessments appear highly acceptable to individuals in low-income populations.
PURPOSE: To examine the acceptability of computer-based assessments among an ethnically diverse, low-income population of primary care patients. Although computers have been used to provide assessments and interventions in health care settings, members of ethnic minority and low-income households have less access to computers than other groups, and therefore the acceptability of computers as a health care assessment and delivery tool needs to be examined. DESIGN: We examined the acceptability of computers for providing assessments of smoking history, nicotine dependence, and other related variables among an ethnically diverse, low-income primary care population. No intervention was used in this study. SETTING: Three inner-city primary care clinics located in hospitals were used as sites for this study. These hospitals were located in areas of the city where low-income and ethnic minority households are overrepresented relative to the total population. SUBJECTS: Adult male and female smokers (n = 522) were recruited while awaiting appointments in each primary care clinic. MEASURES: A questionnaire assessing smoking rate, patterns, history, motivation to quit smoking, and other smoking-related variables was administered using either a paper-and-pencil format or a laptop computer. RESULTS: Frequency counts, analysis of variance, and chi 2 tests were used where appropriate. Most subjects (78.5%) used the computer to complete the baseline survey. Almost all subjects (92%) rated the computer "very easy" or "easy" to use. Subjects who were Spanish-speaking, were born outside the United States, or were Hispanic tended to rate the program as slightly less easy to use than other subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-based assessments appear highly acceptable to individuals in low-income populations.
Authors: Michael J Stirratt; Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob; Heidi M Crane; Jane M Simoni; Susan Czajkowski; Marisa E Hilliard; James E Aikens; Christine M Hunter; Dawn I Velligan; Kristen Huntley; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Cynthia S Rand; Eleanor Schron; Wendy J Nilsen Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Monica R McClain; Glenn E Palomaki; Heather Hampel; Judith A Westman; James E Haddow Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2008-02-23 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Deborah S Main; Javan Quintela; Rodrigo Araya-Guerra; Sherry Holcomb; Wilson D Pace Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Beth C Bock; Karen S Hudmon; James Christian; Amanda L Graham; Frederick R Bock Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 4.244