Literature DB >> 12558666

Prevalence of family history of breast and ovarian cancer in a single primary care practice using a self-administered questionnaire.

Kevin S Hughes1, Constance Roche, Curtis T Campbell, Nancy Siegel, Lisa Salisbury, Amy Chekos, Maya S Katz, Erica Edell.   

Abstract

Women at high risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer require specific management strategies for cancer prevention and early detection. The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of familial breast and ovarian cancer among patients in a primary care practice. Questionnaires were mailed to the 608 women less than 81 years of age in a single primary care practice. Additional mailings and phone calls were used for nonresponders. Data were analyzed by bloodline, the degree of relative, age of diagnosis and cancer type. Women were grouped into three categories of breast/ovarian family history: "no family history,""insignificant family history," and "significant potentially high-risk family history" (women with two or more relatives in a single bloodline with breast and/or ovarian cancer, a single individual with bilateral breast cancer or breast and ovarian cancer, or breast and/or ovarian cancer at less than 40 years of age). A pedigree analysis of women categorized as "significant potentially high-risk family history" further classified these women as to the likelihood of being at risk for hereditary cancer. Data were obtained from 567 women (93%); 27 patients with a personal diagnosis of breast and/or ovarian cancer were excluded. Of the 540 remaining respondents, 351 (65%) had no family history of cancer, 138 (25.6%) had an insignificant family history, and 51 (9.4%) had a significant family history. Based on pedigree analysis of these 51 patients, 19 were unlikely to be at high risk for hereditary cancer, and 32 (6%) were likely to be at significant risk and warrant intensive evaluation. The large proportion of women identified with a significant family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer has major implications regarding the magnitude of a population-based process to identify and manage high-risk individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12558666     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09105.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  16 in total

1.  Screen positive rates among six family history screening protocols for breast/ovarian cancer in four cohorts of women.

Authors:  Monica R McClain; Glenn E Palomaki; Heather Hampel; Judith A Westman; James E Haddow
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Impact of computer-assisted data collection, evaluation and management on the cancer genetic counselor's time providing patient care.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Dawn E McIlvried
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for referral to cancer genetic professionals.

Authors:  Terri Febbraro; Katina Robison; Jennifer Scalia Wilbur; Jessica Laprise; Amy Bregar; Vrishali Lopes; Robert Legare; Ashley Stuckey
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  What characterizes cancer family history collection tools? A critical literature review.

Authors:  J E Cleophat; H Nabi; S Pelletier; K Bouchard; M Dorval
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  A family history questionnaire improves detection of women at risk for hereditary gynecologic cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Margot M Koeneman; Arnold-Jan Kruse; Simone J S Sep; Cynthia S Gubbels; Brigitte F M Slangen; Toon van Gorp; Alberto Lopes; Encarna Gomez-Garcia; Roy F P M Kruitwagen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Effective Referral of Low-Income Women at Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer to Genetic Counseling: A Randomized Delayed Intervention Control Trial.

Authors:  Rena J Pasick; Galen Joseph; Susan Stewart; Celia Kaplan; Robin Lee; Judith Luce; Sharon Davis; Titas Marquez; Tung Nguyen; Claudia Guerra
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Bias in the reporting of family history: implications for clinical care.

Authors:  Elissa M Ozanne; Adrienne O'Connell; Colleen Bouzan; Phil Bosinoff; Taryn Rourke; Dana Dowd; Brian Drohan; Fred Millham; Pat Griffin; Elkan F Halpern; Alan Semine; Kevin S Hughes
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A primary care audit of familial risk in patients with a personal history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Paul Nathan; Aneeta Ahluwalia; Wendy Chorley
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Literacy assessment of family health history tools for public health prevention.

Authors:  C Wang; R E Gallo; L Fleisher; S M Miller
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Development and validation of a simple questionnaire for the identification of hereditary breast cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Patricia Ashton-Prolla; Juliana Giacomazzi; Aishameriane V Schmidt; Fernanda L Roth; Edenir I Palmero; Luciane Kalakun; Ernestina S Aguiar; Susana M Moreira; Erica Batassini; Vanessa Belo-Reyes; Lavinia Schuler-Faccini; Roberto Giugliani; Maira Caleffi; Suzi Alves Camey
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.