Literature DB >> 28357452

Determinants of health-related quality of life for patients after urinary lithotripsy: ureteroscopic vs. shock wave lithotripsy.

Shuzo Hamamoto1,2, Rei Unno3, Kazumi Taguchi3, Taku Naiki3, Ryosuke Ando3, Atsushi Okada3, Takaaki Inoue4, Shinsuke Okada5, Mostafa AbdelRazek3,6, Kenjiro Kohri3, Takahiro Yasui3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the longitudinal health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after surgical intervention with ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and to evaluate the factors affecting HRQoL in urolithiasis patients.
METHODS: A total of 262 patients who underwent lithotripsy (SWL, n = 61; URSL, n = 201) for upper urinary tract calculi treatment between June 2012 and January 2015 were evaluated. All patients were administered the Short-Form 36-item survey (SF-36) to assess HRQoL at four timepoints: before surgery, on the day of discharge, and 1 and 6 months after lithotripsy. Stone-free rates, complications, and analgesic requirements were evaluated to compare the effects of the two procedures on HRQoL.
RESULTS: At the day of discharge, patients in the URSL group had significantly lower mean scores on five different subscales of the SF-36 questionnaire, namely, physical functioning, role-physical, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The stone-free rate at 3 months after lithotripsy was significantly lower in the SWL group (72.1% vs. URSL, 93.0%; p < 0.001). The hospital stay was shorter in the SWL group (2.1 ± 0.07 vs. URSL, 4.1 ± 0.13 days; p < 0.001), and the analgesia requirements were also lower in the SWL group (0.3 ± 0.08 vs. URSL, 0.9 ± 0.20; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The post-lithotripsy HRQoL was superior for SWL compared to URSL on the discharge date despite the lower stone-free rate of the former. The longer hospital stay and higher postoperative pain appeared to be the determinants of the lower HRQoL in the URSL group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesia requirements; Health-related quality of life; Shock wave lithotripsy; The Short-Form 36-item survey; Ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28357452     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-0972-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  27 in total

Review 1.  The results of ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shen Pengfei; Li Yutao; Yang Jie; Wei Wuran; Dai Yi; Zeng Hao; Wang Jia
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Epidemiology and medical management of stone disease.

Authors:  H-G Tiselius
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Study of quality of life and its determinants in patients after urinary stone fragmentation.

Authors:  Mostafa A Arafa; Danny M Rabah
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Annika Andersson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.

Authors:  Jordi Alonso; Montserrat Ferrer; Barbara Gandek; John E Ware; Neil K Aaronson; Paola Mosconi; Niels K Rasmussen; Monika Bullinger; Shunichi Fukuhara; Stein Kaasa; Alain Leplège
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis.

Authors:  John M Shields; Vincent G Bird; Reid Graves; Orlando Gómez-Marín
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Sensitivity of gray scale ultrasound in detecting urinary tract obstruction.

Authors:  P H Ellenbogen; F W Scheible; L B Talner; G R Leopold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of urolithiasis in Japan: national trends between 1965 and 2005.

Authors:  Takahiro Yasui; Masanori Iguchi; Sadao Suzuki; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: short- and long-term effects on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Daniel Adolfo Pérez-Fentes; Francisco Gude; Benito Blanco; Camilo García Freire
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  3 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Independent and interactive effects of kidney stone formation and conventional risk factors for chronic kidney disease: a follow-up study of Japanese men.

Authors:  Ryosuke Ando; Teruo Nagaya; Sadao Suzuki; Hidekatsu Takahashi; Makoto Kawai; Kazumi Taguchi; Shuzo Hamamoto; Atsushi Okada; Takahiro Yasui
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.370

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.