Literature DB >> 22559640

Quantification with a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner.

Spencer L Bowen1, Andrea Ferrero, Ramsey D Badawi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dedicated breast PET/CT is expected to have utility in local staging, surgical planning, monitoring of therapy response, and detection of residual disease for breast cancer. Quantitative metrics will be integral to several such applications. The authors present a validation of fully 3D data correction schemes for a custom built dedicated breast PET/CT (DbPET/CT) scanner via (18)F-FDG phantom scans.
METHODS: A component-based normalization was implemented, live-time was estimated with a multicomponent model, and a variance reduced randoms estimate was computed from delayed coincidences. Attenuation factors were calculated by using a CT based segmentation scheme while scatter was computed using a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation method. As no performance standard currently exists for breast PET systems, custom performance tests were created based on prior patient imaging results. Count-rate linearity for live-time and randoms corrections was measured with a decay experiment for a solid polyethylene cylinder phantom with an offset line source. A MC simulation was used to validate attenuation correction, a multicompartment phantom with asymmetric activity distribution provided an assessment of scatter correction, and image uniformity after geometric and detector normalization was measured from a high count scan of a uniform cylinder phantom. Raw data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) after Fourier rebinning. To quantify performance absolute activity concentrations, contrast recovery coefficients and image uniformity were calculated through region of interest analysis.
RESULTS: The most significant source of error was attributed to mispositioning of events due to pile-up, presenting in count-related axial and transaxial nonuniformities that were not corrected for with the normalization method used here. Within the range of singles counts observed during clinical trials residual error after applying all corrections was comparable to that of a commercial whole body PET/CT system.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that DbPET/CT is capable of producing quantitative images under the operating conditions expected during patient imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22559640      PMCID: PMC3350540          DOI: 10.1118/1.3703593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  34 in total

1.  Developments in component-based normalization for 3D PET.

Authors:  R D Badawi; P K Marsden
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Breast imaging with fluorine-18-FDG PET: quantitative image analysis.

Authors:  N Avril; S Bense; S I Ziegler; J Dose; W Weber; C Laubenbacher; W Römer; F Jänicke; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  The use of importance sampling techniques to improve the efficiency of photon tracking in emission tomography simulations.

Authors:  D R Haynor; R L Harrison; T K Lewellen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  P E Kinahan; D W Townsend; T Beyer; D Sashin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Algorithms for calculating detector efficiency normalization coefficients for true coincidences in 3D PET.

Authors:  R D Badawi; M A Lodge; P K Marsden
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Compression device to reduce motion artifacts at contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the breast.

Authors:  C Schorn; U Fischer; W Döler; M Funke; E Grabbe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Correction for scatter in 3D brain PET using a dual energy window method.

Authors:  S Grootoonk; T J Spinks; D Sashin; N M Spyrou; T Jones
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data.

Authors:  M Defrise; P E Kinahan; D W Townsend; C Michel; M Sibomana; D F Newport
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 2. Effects of inaccurate attenuation correction.

Authors:  S C Huang; E J Hoffman; M E Phelps; D E Kuhl
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  An X-Ray computed tomography/positron emission tomography system designed specifically for breast imaging.

Authors:  John M Boone; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Nathan J Packard; Shih-ying Huang; Spencer Bowen; Ramsey D Badawi; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02
View more
  6 in total

1.  High-resolution (18)F-FDG PET/CT for assessing disease activity in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis: findings of a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Abhijit J Chaudhari; Andrea Ferrero; Felipe Godinez; Kai Yang; David K Shelton; John C Hunter; Stanley M Naguwa; John M Boone; Siba P Raychaudhuri; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Impact of Using Uniform Attenuation Coefficients for Heterogeneously Dense Breasts in a Dedicated Breast PET/X-ray Scanner.

Authors:  Lawrence R MacDonald; Joseph Y Lo; Gregory M Sturgeon; Chengeng Zeng; Robert L Harrison; Paul E Kinahan; William Paul Segars
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Simulation study of quantitative precision of the PET/X dedicated breast PET scanner.

Authors:  Chengeng Zeng; Paul E Kinahan; Hua Qian; Robert L Harrison; Kyle M Champley; Lawrence R MacDonald
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-30

4.  A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Evaluation of basic performance characteristics.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Will Van Kampen; Alexander V Stolin; Wenbo Gong; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Peter F Martone; Mark F Smith; David Sarment; Neal H Clinthorne; Mark Perna
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Augmented Whole-Body Scanning via Magnifying PET.

Authors:  Jianyong Jiang; Suranjana Samanta; Ke Li; Stefan B Siegel; Robert A Mintzer; Sanghee Cho; Maurizio Conti; Matthias Schmand; Joseph O'Sullivan; Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Evaluating attenuation correction strategies in a dedicated, single-gantry breast PET-tomosynthesis scanner.

Authors:  Srilalan Krishnamoorthy; Trevor Vent; Bruno Barufaldi; Andrew D A Maidment; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.609

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.