Literature DB >> 18283518

Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

H Pokorny1, A Klingler, T Schmid, R Fortelny, C Hollinsky, R Kawji, E Steiner, H Pernthaler, R Függer, M Scheyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective randomized multicenter trial was to evaluate the recurrence rates and complications of open versus laparoscopic repairs of inguinal hernias.
METHODS: Patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernias were randomized to Shouldice repair, Bassini operation, tension-free hernioplasty (Lichtenstein repair), laparoscopic transabdominal extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP), or laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP). The primary outcome parameter was the rate of recurrence at 3 years. The secondary outcome was the rate of intraoperative, perioperative, and long-term complications. Follow-up comprised of clinical examination after 1, 2, and 3 years.
RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-five patients were randomly assigned to one of the five procedures. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that the cumulative 3-year recurrence rate was 3.4% in the Bassini group, 4.7% in the Shouldice group, 0% in the Lichtenstein group, 4.7% in the TAPP group, and 5.9% in the TEP group (p = 0.48). Comparing open (Bassini, Shouldice, Lichtenstein) versus laparoscopic (TAPP, TEP) techniques (p = 0.29) and comparing the use of mesh prostheses (Lichtenstein, TAPP, TEP) versus suturing techniques (Bassini, Shouldice) (p = 0.74) showed no significance in the rate of recurrence. The rates of intraoperative (p = 0.15), perioperative (p = 0.09), and long-term complications (p = 0.13) were without significance between the five groups. Comparing mesh techniques (Lichtenstein, TAPP, TEP) versus suturing techniques (Bassini, Shouldice) showed no significance in the rate of complications. The per-protocol analysis for the comparison of mesh (Lichtenstein, TAPP, TEP) versus suturing (Bassini, Shouldice) techniques revealed that recurrences (p = 0.74), intraoperative (p = 0.64), perioperative (p = 0.27), and long-term complications (p = 0.91) were evenly distributed.
CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study, no significant difference in the recurrence rate and complications between laparoscopic and open methods of hernia repair was revealed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18283518     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-008-0357-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  11 in total

1.  Postoperative pain and quality of life after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  H Pokorny; A Klingler; M Scheyer; R Függer; G Bischof
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  The tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid; M M Montllor
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair.

Authors:  M S Liem; Y van der Graaf; C J van Steensel; R U Boelhouwer; G J Clevers; W S Meijer; L P Stassen; J P Vente; W F Weidema; A J Schrijvers; T J van Vroonhoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Open "tension-free" repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique.

Authors:  P K Amid; A G Shulman; I L Lichtenstein
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1996-06

6.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The management of certain abdominal herniae by intra-abdominal closure of the neck of the sac. Preliminary communication.

Authors:  R Ger
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  J H Payne; L M Grininger; M T Izawa; E F Podoll; P J Lindahl; J Balfour
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1994-09

9.  Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  R J Fitzgibbons; J Camps; D A Cornet; N X Nguyen; B S Litke; R Annibali; G M Salerno
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M A Memon; N J Cooper; B Memon; M I Memon; K R Abrams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  62 in total

1.  Long-term results after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  G Tzovaras; D Symeonidis; G Koukoulis; I Baloyiannis; S Georgopoulou; C Pratsas; D Zacharoulis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Patient-perspective quality of life after laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a controlled randomized trial.

Authors:  Ashraf E Abbas; Mohamed E Abd Ellatif; Nashat Noaman; Ahmad Negm; Gamal El-Morsy; Mahmoud Amin; Ahmad Moatamed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  EAES Consensus Development Conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias.

Authors:  M M Poelman; B van den Heuvel; J D Deelder; G S A Abis; N Beudeker; R R Bittner; G Campanelli; D van Dam; B J Dwars; H H Eker; A Fingerhut; I Khatkov; F Koeckerling; J F Kukleta; M Miserez; A Montgomery; R M Munoz Brands; S Morales Conde; F E Muysoms; M Soltes; W Tromp; Y Yavuz; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of open and laparoscopic preperitoneal repair of groin hernia.

Authors:  Jianwen Li; Xin Wang; Xueyi Feng; Yan Gu; Rui Tang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Impact of pressure and gas type on adhesion formation and biomaterial integration in laparoscopy.

Authors:  R Rosch; M Binnebösel; C D Klink; J Otto; K Junge; U P Neumann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A pilot study for one-stop endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Ewoud H Jutte; Huib A Cense; Alphons H M Dur; Michiel A J M Hunfeld; Biron Cramer; Roelf S Breederveld
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Benefits of laparoscopic posterior wall suture repair in treating adolescent indirect inguinal hernias.

Authors:  S R Lee
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  True-FISP MRI in diagnosis of postoperative hernia recurrence: a brief report.

Authors:  U Salati; E Mansour; W Torreggiani
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  A modified laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP) is the standard procedure for inguinal and femoral hernias: a retrospective 17-year analysis with 1,123 hernia repairs.

Authors:  Werner K J Peitsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Yesar El-Dhuwaib; David Corless; Charis Emmett; Mark Deakin; John Slavin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.