Literature DB >> 7826159

Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial.

R J Fitzgibbons1, J Camps, D A Cornet, N X Nguyen, B S Litke, R Annibali, G M Salerno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy represents a viable alternative to the conventional repair and to assess whether a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing both procedures is warranted.
METHODS: Three types of laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies (transabdominal preperitoneal [TAPP], intraperitoneal onlay mesh [IPOM], and totally extraperitoneal [EXTRA]) were studied in a phase II design. Twenty-one investigators from 19 institutions participated. Approval from the local human research committee was required at each institution before patients could be enrolled.
RESULTS: There were 686 patients with 869 hernias; 366 (42.1%) were direct, 414 (47.6%) were indirect, 22 (2.5%) were femoral, and 67 (7.7%) were combination hernias. The TAPP procedure was used for 562 hernias, the IPOM was used for 217 hernias, and the EXTRA was used for 87 hernias. Sixty-one patients had additional abdominal procedures performed at the time of laparoscopy without any adverse affects on their herniorrhaphies. The overall recurrence rate was 4.5%, with a minimum follow-up of 15 months. Complications were divided into the following three groups: 1) those related to laparoscopy, 2) those related to the patient, and 3) those related to the herniorrhaphy. Complications related to the laparoscopy occurred in 5.4% of patients; bleeding or abdominal wall hematomas occurred 31 times, (two patients required transfusion); one patient had bowel perforation, which was sutured laparoscopically; a bladder injury required laparotomy for management. Patient complications occurred in 6.7%. The majority involved the urinary tract (5.8%). Two patients required secondary abdominal procedures for adhesions, one for pain in the right lower quadrant and the other for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Postoperative myocardial infarction on day 5 resulted in the only operative mortality, for a rate of 0.1%. Complications related to the herniorrhaphy itself occurred in 17.1%. Most of these were minor, consisting of transient groin pain (3.5%), seroma (3.5%), transient leg pain (3.3%), hematoma (1.5%), or transient cord or testicular problems (0.9%). The incidence of leg pain decreased dramatically as surgeons became more familiar with the anatomy of the nerve supply to the groin when viewed laparoscopically. Ninety-three percent of patients were discharged within 24 hours of their operations.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy is an effective method to correct an inguinal hernia. It can be offered safely to patients undergoing other abdominal procedures. The TAPP, IPOM, and EXTRA procedures appear to be equally effective. A controlled randomized trial is needed to compare this procedure with conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7826159      PMCID: PMC1234490          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199501000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

Review 1.  Perceived future of laparoscopic general surgery.

Authors:  K A Zucker
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Laparoscopic hernia repair: a point of view.

Authors:  L M Nyhus
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-02

3.  Improvement in endoscopic hernioplasty: transcutaneous aquadissection of the musculofascial defect and preperitoneal endoscopic patch repair.

Authors:  L W Popp
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991

4.  Laparoscopic hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1991-12

5.  Management of indirect inguinal hernias by laparoscopic closure of the neck of the sac.

Authors:  R Ger; K Monroe; R Duvivier; A Mishrick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Laser laparoscopic herniorraphy: a clinical trial preliminary results.

Authors:  L Schultz; J Graber; J Pietrafitta; D Hickok
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1990

Review 7.  Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  C J Filipi; R J Fitzgibbons; G M Salerno; R O Hart
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  A follow-up study on recurrence after inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  T Asmussen; F U Jensen
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1983-02

9.  A laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique for the repair of an indirect inguinal hernia.

Authors:  R J Fitzgibbons; G M Salerno; C J Filipi; W J Hunter; P Watson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic hernia repair: the anatomic basis.

Authors:  A T Spaw; B W Ennis; L P Spaw
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991-10
View more
  77 in total

1.  Cost containment and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  L P Farinas; F D Griffen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in bilateral hernia repair? Results of more than 2800 patients in comparison to literature.

Authors:  Constantin Aurel Wauschkuhn; Jochen Schwarz; Ulf Boekeler; Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; A Fingerhut; J Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Economic evaluation of laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphies: the effect of cost-containment measures and internal hospital policy decisions on costs and charges.

Authors:  Y S Khajanchee; T A G Kenyon; P D Hansen; L L Swanström
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  [The influence of inguinal surgery on the success of a vasectomy reversal].

Authors:  J U Schwarzer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair with local anesthesia.

Authors:  D S Edelman; E P Misiakos; K Moses
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Anterior tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernia under local anesthesia: a 7-year experience in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  E Gianetta; S Cuneo; B Vitale; G Camerini; P Marini; M Stella
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Feasibility and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair after previous open groin hernia repair: a comparative study.

Authors:  Chia-Da Lin; Chih-Hsuan Wu; Ying-Buh Liu; Yao-Chou Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Modified laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh in complicated inguinal hernia surgery.

Authors:  G M Hyllegaard; H Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.