Literature DB >> 23974862

Comparison of open and laparoscopic preperitoneal repair of groin hernia.

Jianwen Li1, Xin Wang, Xueyi Feng, Yan Gu, Rui Tang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compared with laparoscopic groin herniorrhaphy, the open procedure used in most former studies was Lichtenstein repair. However, unlike the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic techniques, Lichtenstein procedure is a premuscular but not preperitoneal repair. This retrospective study compared the outcomes between laparoscopic preperitoneal and open preperitoneal procedure-modified Kugel (MK) herniorrhaphy.
METHODS: Groin hernia patients older than 18 years who underwent open MK or laparoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy in our hospitals between January 2008 and December 2010 were enrolled. Baseline characteristics, recurrence, and intraoperative, short-term, and long-term postoperative complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Among the 1,760 included patients (530 open and 1,230 laparoscopic), 96.08% completed the follow-up (24-60 months). The patients in the open group were older than laparoscopic group (p < 0.001). More bilateral (91.45%) and recurrent (82.12%) hernia patients underwent laparoscopic procedures (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). The overall recurrence rate was 0.71%, with no significant difference between the two approaches (p = 0.227). The overall complication rate was lower for the laparoscopic than the open approach (14.47 vs. 19.25%, p = 0.012), whereas the rates of life-threatening complications were similar (1.51 vs. 0.98%, p = 0.332). The laparoscopic group had significantly lower incidence rates of wound infection and chronic pain (p = 0.016 and p < 0.001, respectively), shorter operative time, lower visual analogue scale scores, and faster recovery than the open group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: As preperitoneal herniorrhaphy, both MK and laparoscopic (TEP/TAPP) procedures are safe and effective, with low incidence rates of life-threatening complications and recurrence. The laparoscopic approach is superior in terms of lower incidence rates of infection and chronic pain, shorter operative time, and faster recovery; however, careful surgical procedure selection and implementation of technical details are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23974862     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3118-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  46 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic versus open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  P Aitola; I Airo; M Matikainen
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1998

3.  Individualization of hernia repair: a new era.

Authors:  L M Nyhus
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Are postoperative complaints and complications influenced by different techniques in fashioning and fixing the mesh in transperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Bernhard J Leibl; Barbara Kraft; Jens Daniel Redecke; Claus Georg Schmedt; Martin Ulrich; Klaus Kraft; Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Eklund; C Rudberg; S Smedberg; L K Enander; C E Leijonmarck; J Osterberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  H Pokorny; A Klingler; T Schmid; R Fortelny; C Hollinsky; R Kawji; E Steiner; H Pernthaler; R Függer; M Scheyer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Preliminary evaluation of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  G R Voeller; E C Mangiante; L G Britt
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-04

10.  Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia.

Authors:  S Kumar; R G Wilson; S J Nixon; I M C Macintyre
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  14 in total

1.  Coagulation and deep vein flow changes following laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a single-center, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chengguang Yang; Leiming Zhu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The impact of type of mesh repair on 2nd recurrence after recurrent groin hernia surgery.

Authors:  D Sevonius; G Sandblom; E Agger; S Smedberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Pubic osteomyelitis after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Y Tashiro; M Murakami; Y Fukoe; Y Lee; M Lee
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Primary unilateral not complicated inguinal hernia with an effective, cheap, less invasive, and easy operation: the Trabucco repair.

Authors:  P G Bruni; M Cavalli; A Aiolfi; F Lombardo; A Morlacchi; G Bonitta; G Campanelli
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Clinical research of preperitoneal drainage after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  D Gao; S Wei; C Zhai; J Chen; M Li; C Gu; H Wu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh hernioplasty: results in 182 Japanese patients.

Authors:  K Tanoue; H Okino; M Kanazawa; K Ueno
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Sudden death caused by acute pulmonary embolism after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  C Yang; L Zhu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Is laparoscopic repair of incarcerated abdominal hernias safe? Analysis of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmad Elnahas; Song Hon H Kim; Allan Okrainec; Fayez Quereshy; Timothy D Jackson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of minimally invasive preperitoneal (MIP) single-layer mesh repair and total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair for inguinal hernia in terms of postoperative chronic pain: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Nergis Aksoy; Kemal Arslan; Osman Doğru; Ömer Karahan; Mehmet Ali Eryılmaz
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-03-01

10.  Factors influencing on difficulty with laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair according to learning period.

Authors:  Byung Soo Park; Dong Yeon Ryu; Gyung Mo Son; Yong Hoon Cho
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.