Literature DB >> 18278508

Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes.

Claudia Schwarz1, Elisabeth Kratochvil, Alexander Pilger, Niels Kuster, Franz Adlkofer, Hugo W Rüdiger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS) was recently introduced as the third generation mobile communication standard in Europe. This was done without any information on biological effects and genotoxic properties of these particular high-frequency electromagnetic fields. This is discomforting, because genotoxic effects of the second generation standard Global System for Mobile Communication have been reported after exposure of human cells in vitro.
METHODS: Human cultured fibroblasts of three different donors and three different short-term human lymphocyte cultures were exposed to 1,950 MHz UMTS below the specific absorption rate (SAR) safety limit of 2 W/kg. The alkaline comet assay and the micronucleus assay were used to ascertain dose and time-dependent genotoxic effects. Five hundred cells per slide were visually evaluated in the comet assay and comet tail factor (CTF) was calculated. In the micronucleus assay 1,000 binucleated cells were evaluated per assay. The origin of the micronuclei was determined by fluorescence labeled anticentromere antibodies. All evaluations were performed under blinded conditions.
RESULTS: UMTS exposure increased the CTF and induced centromere-negative micronuclei (MN) in human cultured fibroblasts in a dose and time-dependent way. Incubation for 24 h at a SAR of 0.05 W/kg generated a statistically significant rise in both CTF and MN (P = 0.02). At a SAR of 0.1 W/kg the CTF was significantly increased after 8 h of incubation (P = 0.02), the number of MN after 12 h (P = 0.02). No UMTS effect was obtained with lymphocytes, either unstimulated or stimulated with Phytohemagglutinin.
CONCLUSION: UMTS exposure may cause genetic alterations in some but not in all human cells in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18278508     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-008-0305-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  41 in total

1.  Intermittent extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields cause DNA damage in a dose-dependent way.

Authors:  Sabine Ivancsits; Elisabeth Diem; Oswald Jahn; Hugo W Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro.

Authors:  Elisabeth Diem; Claudia Schwarz; Franz Adlkofer; Oswald Jahn; Hugo Rüdiger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields alter gene expression in cultured human cells.

Authors:  Sanggyu Lee; Debra Johnson; K Dunbar; Hui Dong; Xijin Ge; Yeong C Kim; Claudia Wing; Nimanthi Jayathilaka; Nimmi Emmanuel; Chenn Q Zhou; Howard L Gerber; Charles C Tseng; San Ming Wang
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  Cellular phones, cordless phones, and the risks of glioma and meningioma (Interphone Study Group, Germany).

Authors:  Joachim Schüz; Eva Böhler; Gabriele Berg; Brigitte Schlehofer; Iris Hettinger; Klaus Schlaefer; Jürgen Wahrendorf; Katharina Kunna-Grass; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Induction of DNA strand breaks by intermittent exposure to extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields in human diploid fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sabine Ivancsits; Elisabeth Diem; Alexander Pilger; Hugo W Rüdiger; Oswald Jahn
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-08-26       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Sizing highly fragmented DNA in individual apoptotic cells using the comet assay and a DNA crosslinking agent.

Authors:  P L Olive; J P Banáth
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells.

Authors:  O Ostling; K J Johanson
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1984-08-30       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 8.  Radiofrequency exposure and mammalian cell toxicity, genotoxicity, and transformation.

Authors:  Martin L Meltz
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.010

9.  Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: results of the Interphone case-control study in five North European countries.

Authors:  M J Schoemaker; A J Swerdlow; A Ahlbom; A Auvinen; K G Blaasaas; E Cardis; H Collatz Christensen; M Feychting; S J Hepworth; C Johansen; L Klaeboe; S Lönn; P A McKinney; K Muir; J Raitanen; T Salminen; J Thomsen; T Tynes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure.

Authors:  Anders Ahlbom; Adele Green; Leeka Kheifets; David Savitz; Anthony Swerdlow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  16 in total

1.  Are these data real? Comments on "No effects of intermittent 50 Hz EMF on cytoplasmic free calcium and on the mitochondrial membrane potential in human diploid fibroblasts." by Pilger et al. (Radiat Environ Biophys 43:203-7 (2004)).

Authors:  Alexander Lerchl
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Expression of concern.

Authors:  H Drexler; K H Schaller
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Answer to comments by A. Lerchl on "Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes" published by C. Schwarz et al. 2008.

Authors:  Hugo W Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Comments on "Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes" by Schwarz et al. (Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2008: doi: 10.1007/s00420-008-0305-5).

Authors:  Alexander Lerchl
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Mobile phone radiofrequency exposure has no effect on DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Elisa Danese; Giuseppe Lippi; Ruggero Buonocore; Marco Benati; Chiara Bovo; Chiara Bonaguri; Gian Luca Salvagno; Giorgio Brocco; Dirk Roggenbuck; Martina Montagnana
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-07

6.  The genotoxic effect of radiofrequency waves on mouse brain.

Authors:  Emin Karaca; Burak Durmaz; Huseyin Aktug; Huseyin Altug; Teoman Yildiz; Candan Guducu; Melis Irgi; Mehtap Gulcihan Cinar Koksal; Ferda Ozkinay; Cumhur Gunduz; Ozgur Cogulu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Increased protein synthesis by cells exposed to a 1,800-MHz radio-frequency mobile phone electromagnetic field, detected by proteome profiling.

Authors:  Christopher Gerner; Verena Haudek; Ulla Schandl; Editha Bayer; Nina Gundacker; Hans Peter Hutter; Wilhelm Mosgoeller
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 8.  Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects.

Authors:  Martin L Pall
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 9.  Pathophysiology of cell phone radiation: oxidative stress and carcinogenesis with focus on male reproductive system.

Authors:  Nisarg R Desai; Kavindra K Kesari; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Microwaves from Mobile Phones Inhibit 53BP1 Focus Formation in Human Stem Cells More Strongly Than in Differentiated Cells: Possible Mechanistic Link to Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Eva Markovà; Lars O G Malmgren; Igor Y Belyaev
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.