Literature DB >> 14628315

Radiofrequency exposure and mammalian cell toxicity, genotoxicity, and transformation.

Martin L Meltz1.   

Abstract

The published in vitro literature relevant to the issue of the possible induction of toxicity, genotoxicity, and transformation of mammalian cells due to radiofrequency field (RF) exposure is examined. In some instances, information about related in vivo studies is presented. The review is from the perspective of technical merit and also biological consistency, especially with regard to those publications reporting a positive effect. The weight of evidence available indicates that, for a variety of frequencies and modulations with both short and long exposure times, at exposure levels that do not (or in some instances do) heat the biological sample such that there is a measurable increase in temperature, RF exposure does not induce (a). DNA strand breaks, (b). chromosome aberrations, (c). sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), (d). DNA repair synthesis, (e). phenotypic mutation, or (f). transformation (cancer-like changes). While there is limited experimental evidence that RF exposure induces micronuclei formation, there is abundant evidence that it does not. There is some evidence that RF exposure does not induce DNA excision repair, suggesting the absence of base damage. There is also evidence that RF exposure does not inhibit excision repair after the induction of thymine dimers by UV exposure, as well as evidence that indicates that RF is not a co-carcinogen or a tumor promoter. The article is in part a tutorial, so that the reader can consider similarities and discrepancies between reports of RF-induced effects relative to one another. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14628315     DOI: 10.1002/bem.10176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  14 in total

Review 1.  Mobile phones: are children at higher risk?

Authors:  Norbert Leitgeb
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

2.  Development of a security system for assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Authors:  Yong Soo Hur; Eun Kyung Ryu; Sung Jin Park; Jeong Yoon; San Hyun Yoon; Gi Deok Yang; Chang Young Hur; Won Don Lee; Jin Ho Lim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Biological effects and safety in magnetic resonance imaging: a review.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giulio Giovannetti; Nicola Vanello; Massimo Lombardi; Luigi Landini; Silvana Simi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes.

Authors:  Claudia Schwarz; Elisabeth Kratochvil; Alexander Pilger; Niels Kuster; Franz Adlkofer; Hugo W Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  MAPK activation by radio waves.

Authors:  J Simon C Arthur
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Adaptive response in mice exposed to 900 MHz radiofrequency fields: primary DNA damage.

Authors:  Bingcheng Jiang; Jihua Nie; Zhen Zhou; Jie Zhang; Jian Tong; Yi Cao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Induction of hair growth by insulin-like growth factor-1 in 1,763 MHz radiofrequency-irradiated hair follicle cells.

Authors:  Sun-Young Yoon; Kyu-Tae Kim; Seong Jin Jo; A-Ri Cho; Soon-Ik Jeon; Hyung-Do Choi; Kyu Han Kim; Gun-Sik Park; Jeong-Ki Pack; Oh Sang Kwon; Woong-Yang Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8GHz) mobile phones induces oxidative stress and reduces sperm motility in rats.

Authors:  Maneesh Mailankot; Anil P Kunnath; H Jayalekshmi; Bhargav Koduru; Rohith Valsalan
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Microwaves from Mobile Phones Inhibit 53BP1 Focus Formation in Human Stem Cells More Strongly Than in Differentiated Cells: Possible Mechanistic Link to Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Eva Markovà; Lars O G Malmgren; Igor Y Belyaev
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Gene and protein expression following exposure to radiofrequency fields from mobile phones.

Authors:  Jacques Vanderstraeten; Luc Verschaeve
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.