Literature DB >> 17804966

Femoral fractures in revision hip surgeries with impacted bone allograft.

Germán L Farfalli1, Martín A Buttaro, Francisco Piccaluga.   

Abstract

Impacted allograft bone in hip revision arthroplasty is a biologic reconstruction method that restores bone loss. Periprosthetic femoral fracture is one of the most frequent complications. However, the incidence, types of fracture, time of occurrence, predisposing factors, and whether and how complication affects the reconstruction are unknown. We analyzed 285 femoral revisions performed with this technique. Fractures occurred in 64 patients (22.4%). Fifty-nine of these 64 incidents (92%) occurred during surgery and five within the first postoperative year. Of the 59 intraoperative lesions, 34 were fractures (57.6%) and 25 were incidental perforations (42.3%). Most fractures and incidental perforations were associated with cement removal rather than the reconstructive technique. The reconstruction was compromised in two of the 34 fractures, but the remainder healed without complications. Five patients had a diaphyseal fracture develop within the first postoperative year, four of whom had an intraoperative incidental perforation. There was an increased risk of fractures within the first postoperative year in patients who had an incidental perforation during surgery and in those with severe bone defects. Despite the high rate of femoral complications associated with this reconstructive technique, most did not influence the reconstruction and only the intraoperative and postoperative complete diaphyseal fractures underwent additional treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17804966     DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318137968c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Bacterial colonization of bone allografts: establishment and effects of antibiotics.

Authors:  Constantinos Ketonis; Stephanie Barr; Christopher S Adams; Noreen J Hickok; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Antibacterial activity of bone allografts: comparison of a new vancomycin-tethered allograft with allograft loaded with adsorbed vancomycin.

Authors:  Constantinos Ketonis; Stephanie Barr; Irving M Shapiro; Javad Parvizi; Christopher S Adams; Noreen J Hickok
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Prevalence and risk factors for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures in one thousand eight hundred and seventy two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Walter Ricioli; Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz; Rodrigo Pereira Guimarães; Emerson K Honda; Giancarlo Polesello; Patricia M de Moraes Barros Fucs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Reduced femoral component subsidence with improved impaction grafting at revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D W Howie; S A Callary; M A McGee; N C Russell; L B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Risk factors for revision of hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 30 years.

Authors:  Julien Girard; Christophe Glorion; François Bonnomet; Damien Fron; Henri Migaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Femoral cement within cement technique in carefully selected aseptic revision arthroplasties.

Authors:  Lucas Marcos; Martin Buttaro; Fernando Comba; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Medium-term outcomes of cemented prostheses and cementless modular prostheses in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Long Wang; Pengfei Lei; Jie Xie; Kanghua Li; Zixun Dai; Yihe Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.