Literature DB >> 16720764

In-cement technique for revision hip arthroplasty.

J F Quinlan1, K O'Shea, F Doyle, O H Brady.   

Abstract

The in-cement technique for revision hip arthroplasty involves retaining the original cement-bone interface. This has been proven to be a biomechanically stronger method than recementing after complete removal of the original cement mantle. This study reviewed a series of 54 consecutive revision hip arthroplasty procedures, using the in-cement technique, between November 1999 and November 2003. Clinical and radiological follow-up included functional assessment. There were 54 procedures performed in 51 patients, whose mean age at surgery was 70.3 years (45 to 85). A total of 42 were available at a mean follow-up of 29.2 months (6 to 51). There was no radiological evidence of loosening. Functional assessments were available for 40 patients who had a mean Harris hip score of 85.2 (51.9 to 98.5), a mean Oxford hip score of 19.6 (12 to 41), a mean UCLA activity profile score of 5.9 (3 to 8) and a mean SF-36 score of 78.0 (31.6 to 100). The in-cement technique provides consistent, high functional outcomes and should be considered in appropriately selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16720764     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.17037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Cement-in-cement hip revision with a long-stemmed femoral component].

Authors:  T K Lichtinger; A Pingsmann; N Erol; C Schulze-Pellengahr; W Teske
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Revision arthroplasty: an update.

Authors:  D Williams; A Taylor; P McLardy-Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  A valuable technique for femoral stem revision in total hip replacement: The in-cement revision - A case series and technical note.

Authors:  C J McDougall; J Yu; K Calligeros; R Crawford; C R Howie
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-01

4.  Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips.

Authors:  Andrew J Berg; Antonia Hoyle; Edward Yates; Aslam Chougle; Rama Mohan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-09

Review 5.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Cement-in-cement versus uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  John W Kennedy; Alex Hrycaiczuk; Nigel Y B Ng; Owen Sheerins; Sanjeev R Patil; Bryn G Jones; Andrew Stark; R M Dominic Meek
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-26

7.  Femoral cement within cement technique in carefully selected aseptic revision arthroplasties.

Authors:  Lucas Marcos; Martin Buttaro; Fernando Comba; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Cement-in-cement technique of the femoral component in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision: A systematic review of the contemporary literature.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Fabio Mancino; Amil Agarwal; Leonidas Roumeliotis; Alex Gu; Ioannis Gkiatas; Danilo Togninalli; Vasileios S Nikolaou; Michael M Alexiades
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases.

Authors:  Toby W Briant-Evans; Darmaraja Veeramootoo; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Matthew J Hubble
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Two stage cementation and screw augmentation of large acetabular defects in low demand patients: Early results and surgical technique.

Authors:  Mohamed Mussa; Varun Dewan; Eric Isbister
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.