Literature DB >> 18276202

Resolution dependence of the non-metric trabecular structure indices.

Miki Sode1, Andrew J Burghardt, Robert A Nissenson, Sharmila Majumdar.   

Abstract

Non-metric indices of topological features of trabecular bone structure, such as structure model index (SMI), connectivity density (Conn.D), and degree of anisotropy (DA), provide unique information relevant to bone quality. With recent technological advancement, in vivo assessment of these indices may be possible from images acquired using high-resolution imaging techniques such as high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). However, more detailed investigation of the dependence of non-metric indices on spatial resolution is needed to determine their applicability. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these three non-metric indices are affected by the spatial resolution of CT images. First, the SMI, Conn.D, and DA were calculated for trabecular bone specimens with varying plate-like and rod-like structures from resampled muCT images across a range of spatial resolutions and compared to the reference values. To account for differences in size across different species and anatomical sites, the results are reported in normalized resolution units. Next, the impact of resolution on the non-metric indices for cores of human distal tibia trabecular bone from clinical HR-pQCT images was evaluated to determine the applicability of the non-metric indices to in vivo imaging. We found that the non-metric indices of trabecular bone structure were affected by spatial resolution of CT images. Particularly, the SMI deviated from the high-resolution muCT reference value depending on the structure type, whether plate-like or rod-like. Both Conn.D and DA were underestimated in the images obtained at an in vivo resolution. It is not trivial to determine absolute threshold for validity of these non-metric indices without considering a specific study design (e.g. relative resolution, the size of the treatment effect to detect, and specimen type). The results of this study provide an upper bound for the accuracy of the non-metric indices under limited resolution scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18276202      PMCID: PMC2329672          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  29 in total

1.  Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone.

Authors:  R Huiskes; R Ruimerman; G H van Lenthe; J D Janssen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Parallel plate model for trabecular bone exhibits volume fraction-dependent bias.

Authors:  J S Day; M Ding; A Odgaard; D R Sumner; I Hvid; H Weinans
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Mechanical consequence of trabecular bone loss and its treatment: a three-dimensional model simulation.

Authors:  X E Guo; C H Kim
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Trabecular bone structure and strength - remodelling and repair.

Authors:  L Mosekilde; E N Ebbesen; L Tornvig; J S Thomsen
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Stephanie Boutroy; Mary L Bouxsein; Francoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Effects of salmon calcitonin on trabecular microarchitecture as determined by magnetic resonance imaging: results from the QUEST study.

Authors:  Charles H Chesnut; Sharmilla Majumdar; David C Newitt; Andrew Shields; Jan Van Pelt; Ellen Laschansky; Moise Azria; Audrey Kriegman; Melvin Olson; Erik F Eriksen; Linda Mindeholm
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Differences in bone turnover and skeletal response to thyroid hormone treatment between estrogen-depleted and repleted rats.

Authors:  S Zeni; C Gomez-Acotto; S Di Gregorio; C Mautalen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Effects of sex and age on bone microstructure at the ultradistal radius: a population-based noninvasive in vivo assessment.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; B Lawrence Riggs; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Ann L Oberg; Lisa J McDaniel; Margaret Holets; James M Peterson; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Effects of thyroid hormone administration and estrogen deficiency on bone mass of female rats.

Authors:  C H Gouveia; V Jorgetti; A C Bianco
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Contribution of trabecular and cortical components to the mechanical properties of bone and their regulating parameters.

Authors:  M Ito; A Nishida; A Koga; S Ikeda; A Shiraishi; M Uetani; K Hayashi; T Nakamura
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  25 in total

1.  Methodological considerations for analyzing trabecular architecture: an example from the primate hand.

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell; Matthew M Skinner; Richard Lazenby; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Quantitative characterization of subject motion in HR-pQCT images of the distal radius and tibia.

Authors:  Miki Sode; Andrew J Burghardt; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Trabecular bone structure parameters from 3D image processing of clinical multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography data.

Authors:  Eva Klintström; Orjan Smedby; Rodrigo Moreno; Torkel B Brismar
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Structural parameters of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone are affected differently by microCT image resolution.

Authors:  H Isaksson; J Töyräs; M Hakulinen; A S Aula; I Tamminen; P Julkunen; H Kröger; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  High-resolution in vivo imaging of bone and joints: a window to microarchitecture.

Authors:  Piet Geusens; Roland Chapurlat; Georg Schett; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; Ego Seeman; Joost de Jong; Joop van den Bergh
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  Clinical cone beam computed tomography compared to high-resolution peripheral computed tomography in the assessment of distal radius bone.

Authors:  C de Charry; S Boutroy; R Ellouz; F Duboeuf; R Chapurlat; H Follet; J B Pialat
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Regional variations of gender-specific and age-related differences in trabecular bone structure of the distal radius and tibia.

Authors:  Miki Sode; Andrew J Burghardt; Galateia J Kazakia; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Assessment of trabecular bone structure using MDCT: comparison of 64- and 320-slice CT using HR-pQCT as the reference standard.

Authors:  Ahi S Issever; Thomas M Link; Marie Kentenich; Patrik Rogalla; Andrew J Burghardt; Galateia J Kazakia; Sharmila Majumdar; Gerd Diederichs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Assessing forearm fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L J Melton; D Christen; B L Riggs; S J Achenbach; R Müller; G H van Lenthe; S Amin; E J Atkinson; S Khosla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  High-resolution peripheral QCT imaging of bone micro-structure in adolescents.

Authors:  M Burrows; D Liu; H McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.