Literature DB >> 20349043

Structural parameters of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone are affected differently by microCT image resolution.

H Isaksson1, J Töyräs, M Hakulinen, A S Aula, I Tamminen, P Julkunen, H Kröger, J S Jurvelin.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study employed microCT to investigate whether image resolution affects bone structural parameters differently in healthy normal and osteoporotic trabecular bone. With increasing image voxel size, the originally detected differences between sample groups diminished. The results suggest that structural differences may not be reliably detected with clinical scanners.
INTRODUCTION: Structural parameters of bone reflect its health status, but are highly dependent on the image resolution. We hypothesized that image resolution affects bone structural parameters differently in normal and osteoporotic trabecular bone.
METHODS: Human trabecular bone samples from the iliac crest and the knee were analyzed (normal n = 11, osteoporotic n = 15) using a high-resolution microCT (14 or 18 µm voxel sizes). Images were re-sampled to voxel sizes 1-16 times larger than the original image and thresholded with global or local adaptive algorithms. Absolute and normalized values of each structural parameter were calculated, and the effect of decreasing image resolution was compared between the normal and osteoporotic samples.
RESULTS: Normal and osteoporotic samples had different (p < 0.05) absolute bone volume fractions. However, the normalized values showed that the osteoporotic samples were more prone to errors (p < 0.05) with increased voxel size. The absolute values of trabecular number, trabecular separation, degree of anisotropy, and structure model index were different between the groups at the original voxel size (p < 0.05), but at voxel sizes between 60 and 110 µm, those differences were no longer significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that structural differences between osteoporotic and normal trabecular bone may not be reliably detected with clinical CT scanners providing image voxel sizes above 100 µm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20349043     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1219-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  36 in total

Review 1.  Report on osteoporosis in the European Community: current status and recommendations for the future. Working Party from European Union Member States.

Authors:  J E Compston; S E Papapoulos; F Blanchard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  In vivo determination of bone structure in postmenopausal women: a comparison of HR-pQCT and high-field MR imaging.

Authors:  Galateia J Kazakia; Benedict Hyun; Andrew J Burghardt; Roland Krug; David C Newitt; Anne E de Papp; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Transmenopausal changes in the trabecular bone structure.

Authors:  M P Akhter; J M Lappe; K M Davies; R R Recker
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Interindividual and intraspecimen variability of 3-D bone microarchitectural parameters in iliac crest biopsies imaged by conventional micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Christine Chappard; Arnaud Marchadier; Laurent Benhamou
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Fabric and elastic principal directions of cancellous bone are closely related.

Authors:  A Odgaard; J Kabel; B van Rietbergen; M Dalstra; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Clinical utility of microarchitecture measurements of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Sex differences of human trabecular bone microstructure in aging are site-dependent.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Maiko Matsuura; Volker Kuhn; Mathias Priemel; Ralph Müller; Thomas M Link; Eva-Maria Lochmüller
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Stereological measures of trabecular bone structure: comparison of 3D micro computed tomography with 2D histological sections in human proximal tibial bone biopsies.

Authors:  J S Thomsen; A Laib; B Koller; S Prohaska; Li Mosekilde; W Gowin
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Noninvasive monitoring of changes in structural cancellous bone parameters with a novel prototype micro-CT.

Authors:  Jürg A Gasser; Peter Ingold; Konstantina Grosios; Andres Laib; Stephan Hämmerle; Bruno Koller
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  13 in total

1.  Relationships of quantitative ultrasound parameters with cancellous bone microstructure in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Maureen L Dreher; Sheng L Gibson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Methodological considerations for analyzing trabecular architecture: an example from the primate hand.

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell; Matthew M Skinner; Richard Lazenby; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Influence of the shape of the micro-finite element model on the mechanical properties calculated from micro-finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Wen; Hai-Long Yu; Ya-Bo Yan; Chun-Lin Zong; Hai-Jiao Ding; Xiang-Yu Ma; Tian-Sheng Wang; Wei Lei
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Bone quality changes associated with aging and disease: a review.

Authors:  Adele L Boskey; Laurianne Imbert
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Reproducibility and agreement of micro-CT and histomorphometry in human trabecular bone with different metabolic status.

Authors:  Inari S Tamminen; Hanna Isaksson; Antti S Aula; Eero Honkanen; Jukka S Jurvelin; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Comparison of anterior and posterior trabecular bone microstructure of human mandible using cone-beam CT and micro CT.

Authors:  Norliza Ibrahim; Azin Parsa; Bassam Hassan; Paul van der Stelt; Rabiah A Rahmat; Siti M Ismail; Irene H A Aartman
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Cortical and trabecular bone structure of the hominoid capitate.

Authors:  Emma E Bird; Tracy L Kivell; Matthew M Skinner
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Effect of micro-computed tomography voxel size and segmentation method on trabecular bone microstructure measures in mice.

Authors:  Blaine A Christiansen
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2016-05-27

9.  Can repeated in vivo micro-CT irradiation during adolescence alter bone microstructure, histomorphometry and longitudinal growth in a rodent model?

Authors:  Tanvir Mustafy; Aurélie Benoit; Irène Londono; Florina Moldovan; Isabelle Villemure
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Trabecular bone structure correlates with hand posture and use in hominoids.

Authors:  Zewdi J Tsegai; Tracy L Kivell; Thomas Gross; N Huynh Nguyen; Dieter H Pahr; Jeroen B Smaers; Matthew M Skinner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.