Literature DB >> 18273556

A new method for ligand docking to flexible receptors by dual alanine scanning and refinement (SCARE).

Giovanni Bottegoni1, Irina Kufareva, Maxim Totrov, Ruben Abagyan.   

Abstract

Protein binding sites undergo ligand specific conformational changes upon ligand binding. However, most docking protocols rely on a fixed conformation of the receptor, or on the prior knowledge of multiple conformations representing the variation of the pocket, or on a known bounding box for the ligand. Here we described a general induced fit docking protocol that requires only one initial pocket conformation and identifies most of the correct ligand positions as the lowest score. We expanded a previously used diverse "cross-docking" benchmark to thirty ligand-protein pairs extracted from different crystal structures. The algorithm systematically scans pairs of neighbouring side chains, replaces them by alanines, and docks the ligand to each 'gapped' version of the pocket. All docked positions are scored, refined with original side chains and flexible backbone and re-scored. In the optimal version of the protocol pairs of residues were replaced by alanines and only one best scoring conformation was selected from each 'gapped' pocket for refinement. The optimal SCARE (SCan Alanines and REfine) protocol identifies a near native conformation (under 2 angstroms RMSD) as the lowest rank for 80% of pairs if the docking bounding box is defined by the predicted pocket envelope, and for as many as 90% of the pairs if the bounding box is derived from the known answer with approximately 5 angstroms margin as used in most previous publications. The presented fully automated algorithm takes about 2 h per pose of a single processor time, requires only one pocket structure and no prior knowledge about the binding site location. Furthermore, the results for conformationally conserved pockets do not deteriorate due to substantial increase of the pocket variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18273556      PMCID: PMC2641994          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-008-9188-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  31 in total

1.  Accurate and efficient generalized born model based on solvent accessibility: derivation and application for LogP octanol/water prediction and flexible peptide docking.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme.

Authors:  Jung-Hsin Lin; Alexander L Perryman; Julie R Schames; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 3.  Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery.

Authors:  Simon J Teague
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking.

Authors:  Badry D Bursulaya; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.

Authors:  Claudio N Cavasotto; Ruben A Abagyan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes.

Authors:  F Jiang; S H Kim
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes.

Authors:  J W Ponder; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins.

Authors:  R Abagyan; M Totrov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-01-21       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility.

Authors:  A R Leach
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-01-07       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  A method to configure protein side-chains from the main-chain trace in homology modelling.

Authors:  F Eisenmenger; P Argos; R Abagyan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  24 in total

1.  Improved ligand-protein binding affinity predictions using multiple binding modes.

Authors:  Eva Stjernschantz; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Exploiting conformational dynamics in drug discovery: design of C-terminal inhibitors of Hsp90 with improved activities.

Authors:  Elisabetta Moroni; Huiping Zhao; Brian S J Blagg; Giorgio Colombo
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Status of GPCR modeling and docking as reflected by community-wide GPCR Dock 2010 assessment.

Authors:  Irina Kufareva; Manuel Rueda; Vsevolod Katritch; Raymond C Stevens; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Neurotoxicology of bis(n)-tacrines on Blattella germanica and Drosophila melanogaster acetylcholinesterase.

Authors:  James M Mutunga; Dhana Raj Boina; Troy D Anderson; Jeffrey R Bloomquist; Paul R Carlier; Dawn M Wong; Polo C-H Lam; Maxim M Totrov
Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 1.698

5.  Structure-based predictions of activity cliffs.

Authors:  Jarmila Husby; Giovanni Bottegoni; Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Recipes for the selection of experimental protein conformations for virtual screening.

Authors:  Manuel Rueda; Giovanni Bottegoni; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Identifying conformational changes of the beta(2) adrenoceptor that enable accurate prediction of ligand/receptor interactions and screening for GPCR modulators.

Authors:  Kimberly A Reynolds; Vsevolod Katritch; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design.

Authors:  Pietro Cozzini; Glen E Kellogg; Francesca Spyrakis; Donald J Abraham; Gabriele Costantino; Andrew Emerson; Francesca Fanelli; Holger Gohlke; Leslie A Kuhn; Garrett M Morris; Modesto Orozco; Thelma A Pertinhez; Menico Rizzi; Christoph A Sotriffer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Automated site preparation in physics-based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes.

Authors:  Chaya S Rapp; Cheryl Schonbrun; Matthew P Jacobson; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Niu Huang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-10

10.  Four-dimensional docking: a fast and accurate account of discrete receptor flexibility in ligand docking.

Authors:  Giovanni Bottegoni; Irina Kufareva; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.