Literature DB >> 15001363

Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.

Claudio N Cavasotto1, Ruben A Abagyan.   

Abstract

The main complicating factor in structure-based drug design is receptor rearrangement upon ligand binding (induced fit). It is the induced fit that complicates cross-docking of ligands from different ligand-receptor complexes. Previous studies have shown the necessity to include protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening. Very few docking methods have been developed to predict the induced fit reliably and, at the same time, to improve on discriminating between binders and non-binders in the virtual screening process. We present an algorithm called the ICM-flexible receptor docking algorithm (IFREDA) to account for protein flexibility in virtual screening. By docking flexible ligands to a flexible receptor, IFREDA generates a discrete set of receptor conformations, which are then used to perform flexible ligand-rigid receptor docking and scoring. This is followed by a merging and shrinking step, where the results of the multiple virtual screenings are condensed to improve the enrichment factor. In the IFREDA approach, both side-chain rearrangements and essential backbone movements are taken into consideration, thus sampling adequately the conformational space of the receptor, even in cases of large loop movements. As a preliminary step, to show the importance of incorporating protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening, and to validate the merging and shrinking procedure, we compiled an extensive small-scale virtual screening benchmark of 33 crystal structures of four different protein kinases sub-families (cAPK, CDK-2, P38 and LCK), where we obtained an enrichment factor fold-increase of 1.85+/-0.65 using two or three multiple experimental conformations. IFREDA was used in eight protein kinase complexes and was able to find the correct ligand conformation and discriminate the correct conformations from the "misdocked" conformations solely on the basis of energy calculation. Five of the generated structures were used in the small-scale virtual screening stage and, by merging and shrinking the results with those of the original structure, we show an enrichment factor fold increase of 1.89+/-0.60, comparable to that obtained using multiple experimental conformations. Our cross-docking tests on the protein kinase benchmark underscore the necessity of incorporating protein flexibility in both ligand docking and virtual screening. The methodology presented here will be extremely useful in cases where few or no experimental structures of complexes are available, while some binders are known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15001363     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  101 in total

1.  Utilizing experimental data for reducing ensemble size in flexible-protein docking.

Authors:  Mengang Xu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Virtual target screening: validation using kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Daniel N Santiago; Yuri Pevzner; Ashley A Durand; MinhPhuong Tran; Rachel R Scheerer; Kenyon Daniel; Shen-Shu Sung; H Lee Woodcock; Wayne C Guida; Wesley H Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Chemical space sampling by different scoring functions and crystal structures.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Christine Humblet
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Vaccinia virus virulence factor N1L is a novel promising target for antiviral therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Anton V Cheltsov; Mika Aoyagi; Alexander Aleshin; Eric Chi-Wang Yu; Taylor Gilliland; Dayong Zhai; Andrey A Bobkov; John C Reed; Robert C Liddington; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Docking flexible ligands in proteins with a solvent exposure- and distance-dependent dielectric function.

Authors:  Daniel P Garden; Boris S Zhorov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Discovery of novel checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors by virtual screening based on multiple crystal structures.

Authors:  Yan Li; Dong Joon Kim; Weiya Ma; Ronald A Lubet; Ann M Bode; Zigang Dong
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Structural determinants of PERK inhibitor potency and selectivity.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Jaime Blais; David Ron; Timothy Cardozo
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.817

8.  Docking validation resources: protein family and ligand flexibility experiments.

Authors:  Sudipto Mukherjee; Trent E Balius; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Recipes for the selection of experimental protein conformations for virtual screening.

Authors:  Manuel Rueda; Giovanni Bottegoni; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.