Literature DB >> 12396486

The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather.

Thierry Lengagne1, Peter J B Slater.   

Abstract

Numerous attempts have been made to quantify ecological factors that affect the calling range of animal signals. The various processes leading signals to become distorted and embedded in background noise have been described in many habitats (ranging from forest to savannah) and the propagation path in these biomes has thereby been characterized. However, the impact of climatic factors on acoustic communication has been little studied. Surprisingly, to our knowledge, the importance of rain, a regular phenomenon occurring in all habitats except deserts, has never been investigated. Here, we describe a 69-fold advantage in area reached by the call of a territorial bird, the tawny owl (Strix aluco) in dry versus rainy conditions. In support of this, we found a marked reduction in the calling of tawny owls in rainy conditions. Constraints imposed by a rainy propagation path are likely to modify the reliability of acoustic information and thus calling behaviour of many animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12396486      PMCID: PMC1691141          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  4 in total

1.  Whale songs lengthen in response to sonar.

Authors:  P J Miller; N Biassoni; A Samuels; P L Tyack
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey.

Authors:  J M Sinnott; W C Stebbins; D B Moody
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect.

Authors:  K Manabe; E I Sadr; R J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  The influence of surface atmospheric conditions on the range and area reached by animal vocalizations.

Authors:  D Larom; M Garstang; K Payne; R Raspet; M Lindeque
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.312

  4 in total
  18 in total

1.  Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Richard A Peters; Barbara Clucas; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals.

Authors:  Richard Peters; Jan Hemmi; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Learning to cope: vocal adjustment to urban noise is correlated with prior experience in black-capped chickadees.

Authors:  Stefanie E LaZerte; Hans Slabbekoorn; Ken A Otter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Multiple signals and male spacing affect female preference at cocktail parties in treefrogs.

Authors:  Christina Richardson; Thierry Lengagne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Influence of weather on gobbling activity of male wild turkeys.

Authors:  Patrick H Wightman; James A Martin; John C Kilgo; Emily Rushton; Bret A Collier; Michael J Chamberlain
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Singing by male and female Kloss gibbons (Hylobates klossii) in the Peleonan Forest, Siberut Island, Indonesia.

Authors:  Helen M Dooley; Debra S Judge; Lincoln H Schmitt
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Long recording sequences: how to track the intra-individual variability of acoustic signals.

Authors:  Thierry Lengagne; Doris Gomez; Rémy Josserand; Yann Voituron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Environmental correlates of geographic divergence in a phenotypic trait: A case study using bat echolocation.

Authors:  Tinyiko Maluleke; David S Jacobs; Henning Winker
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  Measuring acoustic habitats.

Authors:  Nathan D Merchant; Kurt M Fristrup; Mark P Johnson; Peter L Tyack; Matthew J Witt; Philippe Blondel; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 7.781

10.  Patterns of Song across Natural and Anthropogenic Soundscapes Suggest That White-Crowned Sparrows Minimize Acoustic Masking and Maximize Signal Content.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Derryberry; Raymond M Danner; Julie E Danner; Graham E Derryberry; Jennifer N Phillips; Sara E Lipshutz; Katherine Gentry; David A Luther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.