Literature DB >> 17614279

Signaling against the wind: modifying motion-signal structure in response to increased noise.

Richard A Peters1, Jan M Hemmi, Jochen Zeil.   

Abstract

Animal signals are optimized for particular signaling environments [1-3]. While signaling, senders often choose favorable conditions that ensure reliable detection and transmission [4-8], suggesting that they are sensitive to changes in signal efficacy. Recent evidence has also shown that animals will increase the amplitude or intensity of their acoustic signals at times of increased environmental noise [9-11]. The nature of these adjustments provides important insights into sensory processing. However, only a single piece of correlative evidence for signals defined by movement suggests that visual-signal design depends on ambient motion noise [12]. Here we show experimentally for the first time that animals communicating with movement will adjust their displays when environmental motion noise increases. Surprisingly, under sustained wind conditions, the Australian lizard Amphibolurus muricatus changed the structure and increased the duration of its introductory tail flicking, rather than increasing signaling speed. The way these lizards restructure the alerting component of their movement-based aggressive display in the presence of increased motion noise highlights the challenge we face in understanding motion-detection mechanisms under natural operating conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17614279     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  22 in total

1.  Motion perception and visual signal design in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Leo J Fleishman; Adam C Pallus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Environmental motion delays the detection of movement-based signals.

Authors:  Richard A Peters
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals.

Authors:  Richard Peters; Jan Hemmi; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Alert signals enhance animal communication in "noisy" environments.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Variability of a dynamic visual signal: the fiddler crab claw-waving display.

Authors:  Martin J How; Jochen Zeil; Jan M Hemmi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Modeling and measuring the visual detection of ecologically relevant motion by an Anolis lizard.

Authors:  Adam C Pallus; Leo J Fleishman; Philip M Castonguay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Predation-associated modulation of movement-based signals by a Bahamian lizard.

Authors:  David S Steinberg; Jonathan B Losos; Thomas W Schoener; David A Spiller; Jason J Kolbe; Manuel Leal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Foliage motion under wind, from leaf flutter to branch buffeting.

Authors:  Loïc Tadrist; Marc Saudreau; Pascal Hémon; Xavier Amandolese; André Marquier; Tristan Leclercq; Emmanuel de Langre
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Vocal plasticity in a reptile.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Sue Anne Zollinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Motion-based signaling in sympatric species of Australian agamid lizards.

Authors:  Jose A Ramos; Richard A Peters
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.