Literature DB >> 15951962

Psychological distress in women at risk of hereditary breast/ovarian or HNPCC cancers in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Amy Østertun Geirdal1, Jon G Reichelt, Alv A Dahl, Ketil Heimdal, Lovise Maehle, Astrid Stormorken, Pål Møller.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine psychological distress in women at risk of familial breast-ovarian cancer (FBOC) or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) with absence of demonstrated mutations in the family (unknown mutation).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-hundred and fifty three consecutive women at risk of FBOC and 77 at risk of HNPCC and with no present or past history of cancer. They were aware of their risk and had received genetic counseling. Comparisons were made between these two groups, normal controls, and women who were identified to be BRCA1 mutation carriers. The questionnaires Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Impact of Event Scale (IES) were employed to assess psychological distress.
RESULTS: No significant differences concerning psychological distress were observed between women with FBOC and women with HNPCC. Compared to mutation carriers for BRCA1, the level of anxiety and depression was significantly higher in the FBOC group with absence of demonstrated mutation. Compared to normal controls, the level of anxiety was higher, while the level of depression was lower in the groups with unknown mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: Women in the absence of demonstrated mutations have higher anxiety and depression levels than women with known mutation-carrier status. Access to genetic testing may be of psychologically benefit to women at risk for FBOC or HNPCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15951962     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-004-7995-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  31 in total

1.  Uptake of BRCA1 genetic testing in adult sisters and daughters of known mutation carriers in Norway.

Authors:  Trine Levin Bodd; Jon Reichelt; Ketil Heimdal; Pal Moller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  K Aktan-Collan; A Haukkala; J P Mecklin; A Uutela; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale amongst women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  B Thewes; B Meiser; I B Hickie
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Psychological distress in healthy women with familial breast cancer: like mother, like daughter?

Authors:  L Baider; P Ever-Hadani; A Kaplan De-Nour
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.210

5.  Psychological impact of genetic testing in women from high-risk breast cancer families.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Friedlander; A Barratt; V Schnieden; M Watson; J Brown; K Tucker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC.

Authors:  H F Vasen; P Watson; J P Mecklin; H T Lynch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Survival in prospectively ascertained familial breast cancer: analysis of a series stratified by tumour characteristics, BRCA mutations and oophorectomy.

Authors:  Pål Møller; Ake Borg; D Gareth Evans; Neva Haites; Marta M Reis; Hans Vasen; Elaine Anderson; C Michael Steel; Jaran Apold; David Goudie; Anthony Howell; Fiona Lalloo; Lovise Maehle; Helen Gregory; Ketil Heimdal
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-20       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  BRCA1 testing with definitive results: a prospective study of psychological distress in a large clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Jon G Reichelt; Ketil Heimdal; Pål Møller; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Genetic counseling in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer in Israel: psychosocial impact and retention of genetic information.

Authors:  Michal DiCastro; Moshe Frydman; Irit Friedman; Ronit Shiri-Sverdlov; Moshe Z Papa; Boleslaw Goldman; Eitan Friedman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-08-01

10.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  Psychological factors associated with emotional responses to receiving genetic risk information.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Kate Brain; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Gethin Griffith; Barbara France; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Is no news good news? Inconclusive genetic test results in BRCA1 and BRCA2 from patients and professionals' perspectives.

Authors:  Audrey Ardern-Jones; Regina Kenen; Elly Lynch; Rebecca Doherty; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.857

3.  The impact of risk-reducing gynaecological surgery in premenopausal women at high risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer due to Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Ramona Moldovan; Sianan Keating; Tara Clancy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  The relationship between psychological distress and personality in women from families with familial breast/ovarian or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Experience of Norwegian Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation-Carrying Participants in Educational Support Groups: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Marion Myklebust; Eva Gjengedal; Nina Strømsvik
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Psychological and cancer-specific distress at 18 months post-testing in women with demonstrated BRCA1 mutations for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jon G Reichelt; Pål Møller; Ketil Heimdal; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Quality of life and its relation to cancer-related stress in women of families with hereditary cancer without demonstrated mutation.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Lovise Maehle; Ketil Heimdal; Astrid Stormorken; Pål Møller; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Intrusion and avoidance in subjects undergoing genetic investigation and counseling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Cathrine Bjorvatn; Geir Egil Eide; Berit R Hanestad; Anniken Hamang; Odd E Havik
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Psychosocial impact of Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome.

Authors:  Alice Woo; Amit Sadana; David T Mauger; Maria J Baker; Terri Berk; Thomas J McGarrity
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 10.  Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact.

Authors:  Karin M Landsbergen; Judith B Prins; Han G Brunner; Floris W Kraaimaat; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.