Literature DB >> 18259594

Effects of delayed auditory feedback and frequency-shifted feedback on speech control and some potentials for future development of prosthetic aids for stammering.

Peter Howell1.   

Abstract

It has been known for at least a hundred years that the speech of a person who stammers becomes more fluent when alterations are made to the speaking environment. Alterations that lead to an improvement in fluency include a) noises that prevent a speaker hearing his or her own voice, and b) manipulations to the sound of a speaker's voice before it is heard. Examples of manipulations that have been made are introducing a delay, and shifting the voice up or down in frequency. The influences all these alterations have on fluent speakers and speakers who stammer, that have been established over the last century, are reviewed. In addition, the ways in which these phenomena have been explained for both fluent speaker and speakers who stammer are outlined. Several previous findings have potential significance for ways in which the fluency-enhancing effects of these alterations in speakers who stammer could be employed in clinical settings. These are highlighted and discussed, mainly in connection with the SpeechEasy prosthetic device for treating stammering.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 18259594      PMCID: PMC2231594     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stammering Res        ISSN: 1742-5867


  44 in total

1.  [Delayed auditory feed-back in stutterers (Lee effect)].

Authors:  E NESSEL
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)       Date:  1958

2.  Experiments upon the total inhibition of stammering by external control, and some clinical results.

Authors:  C CHERRY; B M SAYERS
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Effect of altered auditory feedback on people who stutter during scripted telephone conversations.

Authors:  S Zimmerman; J Kalinowski; A Stuart; M Rastatter
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Artificial stutter.

Authors:  B S LEE
Journal:  J Speech Disord       Date:  1951-03

5.  The effect of delayed side-tone upon vocal rate and intensity.

Authors:  J W BLACK
Journal:  J Speech Disord       Date:  1951-03

6.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  An interpretation of research of feedback interruption in speech.

Authors:  G J Borden
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Interrelationships among fluency producing variables in stuttered speech.

Authors:  R L Webster; B B Lubker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1968-12

9.  Methods of interval selection, presence of noise and their effects on detectability of repetitions and prolongations.

Authors:  P Howell; A Staveley; S Sackin; L Rustin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech Rate Modification and Its Effects on Fluency Reversal in Fluent Speakers and People Who Stutter.

Authors:  Peter Howell; Stevie Sackin
Journal:  J Dev Phys Disabil       Date:  2000-12-01
View more
  12 in total

1.  Utterance complexity and stuttering on function words in preschool-age children who stutter.

Authors:  Corrin Richels; Anthony Buhr; Edward Conture; Katerina Ntourou
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  The role of feedback in the production of skilled finger sequences.

Authors:  Nicola J Popp; Carlos R Hernandez-Castillo; Paul L Gribble; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The neural control of volitional vocal production-from speech to identity, from social meaning to song.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The effects of gated speech on the fluency of speakers who stutter.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.849

5.  Effectiveness of frequency shifted feedback at reducing disfluency for linguistically easy, and difficult, sections of speech (original audio recordings included).

Authors:  Peter Howell; Stephen Davis; Jon Bartrip; Laura Wormald
Journal:  Stammering Res       Date:  2004-09-01

6.  Adaptation to delayed auditory feedback induces the temporal recalibration effect in both speech perception and production.

Authors:  Kosuke Yamamoto; Hideaki Kawabata
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effects of delayed and frequency shifted feedback on speakers with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Bettina Brendel; Anja Lowit; Peter Howell
Journal:  J Med Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2004-12-01

8.  The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production.

Authors:  Jennifer Chesters; Ladan Baghai-Ravary; Riikka Möttönen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Incidental or Intentional? Different Brain Responses to One's Own Action Sounds in Hurdling vs. Tap Dancing.

Authors:  Nina Heins; Jennifer Pomp; Daniel S Kluger; Ima Trempler; Karen Zentgraf; Markus Raab; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The effect of delayed auditory feedback on activity in the temporal lobe while speaking: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Hideki Takaso; Frank Eisner; Richard Js Wise; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.