Literature DB >> 25698020

The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production.

Jennifer Chesters1, Ladan Baghai-Ravary2, Riikka Möttönen1.   

Abstract

Monitoring the sensory consequences of articulatory movements supports speaking. For example, delaying auditory feedback of a speaker's voice disrupts speech production. Also, there is evidence that this disruption may be decreased by immediate visual feedback, i.e., seeing one's own articulatory movements. It is, however, unknown whether delayed visual feedback affects speech production in fluent speakers. Here, the effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech fluency (i.e., speech rate and errors), vocal control (i.e., intensity and pitch), and speech rhythm were investigated. Participants received delayed (by 200 ms) or immediate auditory feedback, while repeating sentences. Moreover, they received either no visual feedback, immediate visual feedback, or delayed visual feedback (by 200, 400, and 600 ms). Delayed auditory feedback affected fluency, vocal control, and rhythm. Immediate visual feedback had no effect on any of the speech measures when it was combined with delayed auditory feedback. Delayed visual feedback did, however, affect speech fluency when it was combined with delayed auditory feedback. In sum, the findings show that delayed auditory feedback disrupts fluency, vocal control, and rhythm and that delayed visual feedback can strengthen the disruptive effect of delayed auditory feedback on fluency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698020      PMCID: PMC4477042          DOI: 10.1121/1.4906266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  44 in total

1.  Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Speech disruption during delayed auditory feedback with simultaneous visual feedback.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; Danielle Striemer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on sequence production.

Authors:  J D Kulpa; Peter Q Pfordresher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual feedback during speech production.

Authors:  N Tye-Murray
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.

Authors:  J L ELman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca's aphasia to produce fluent speech.

Authors:  Julius Fridriksson; H Isabel Hubbard; Sarah Grace Hudspeth; Audrey L Holland; Leonardo Bonilha; Davida Fromm; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Quantifying speech rhythm abnormalities in the dysarthrias.

Authors:  Julie M Liss; Laurence White; Sven L Mattys; Kaitlin Lansford; Andrew J Lotto; Stephanie M Spitzer; John N Caviness
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The bimodal perception of speech in infancy.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; A N Meltzoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The effects of self-generated synchronous and asynchronous visual speech feedback on overt stuttering frequency.

Authors:  Gregory J Snyder; Monica Strauss Hough; Paul Blanchet; Lennette J Ivy; Dwight Waddell
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback and frequency-shifted feedback on speech control and some potentials for future development of prosthetic aids for stammering.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Stammering Res       Date:  2004-04-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Visualising the topography of the acoustic radiation in clinical diffusion tensor imaging scans.

Authors:  S Bryn Dhir; Kwame S Kutten; Muwei Li; Andreia V Faria; Laurent Younes; J Tilak Ratnanather
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Brain-Computer Interface: Applications to Speech Decoding and Synthesis to Augment Communication.

Authors:  Shiyu Luo; Qinwan Rabbani; Nathan E Crone
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.088

3.  Sensitivity of Speech Output to Delayed Auditory Feedback in Primary Progressive Aphasias.

Authors:  Chris J D Hardy; Rebecca L Bond; Kankamol Jaisin; Charles R Marshall; Lucy L Russell; Katrina Dick; Sebastian J Crutch; Jonathan D Rohrer; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Relating resting-state hemodynamic changes to the variable language profiles in post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Ying Zhao; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Ajay D Halai
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.