Literature DB >> 17726328

The effects of gated speech on the fluency of speakers who stutter.

Peter Howell1.   

Abstract

It is known that the speech of people who stutter improves when the speaker's own vocalization is changed while the participant is speaking. One explanation of these effects is the disruptive rhythm hypothesis (DRH). The DRH maintains that the manipulated sound only needs to disturb timing to affect speech control. The experiment investigated whether speech that was gated on and off (interrupted) affected the speech control of speakers who stutter. Eight children who stutter read a passage when they heard their voice normally and when the speech was gated. Fluency was enhanced (fewer errors were made and time to read a set passage was reduced) when speech was interrupted in this way. The results support the DRH. Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17726328      PMCID: PMC1995037          DOI: 10.1159/000104463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop        ISSN: 1021-7762            Impact factor:   0.849


  27 in total

1.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables.

Authors:  Thomas M Donath; Ulrich Natke; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Experiments upon the total inhibition of stammering by external control, and some clinical results.

Authors:  C CHERRY; B M SAYERS
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Influence of visual echo and visual reverberation on speech fluency in stutterers.

Authors:  E Smołka; B Adamczyk
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  The effect of delayed side-tone upon vocal rate and intensity.

Authors:  J W BLACK
Journal:  J Speech Disord       Date:  1951-03

5.  Effect of acoustical, visual and tactile echo on speech fluency of stutterers.

Authors:  W Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak; E Smołka; B Adamczyk
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 0.849

6.  An interpretation of research of feedback interruption in speech.

Authors:  G J Borden
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Studies on the metronome effect on stuttering.

Authors:  J P Brady
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1969-05

8.  Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.

Authors:  J L ELman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Rhythm as a distractor in the modification of stuttering.

Authors:  F Fransella
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1967-08

10.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback and frequency-shifted feedback on speech control and some potentials for future development of prosthetic aids for stammering.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Stammering Res       Date:  2004-04-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Increasing phonological complexity reveals heightened instability in inter-articulatory coordination in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Anne Smith; Neeraja Sadagopan; Bridget Walsh; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback on speech kinematics in fluent speakers.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2012-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.