Literature DB >> 35235441

The role of feedback in the production of skilled finger sequences.

Nicola J Popp1, Carlos R Hernandez-Castillo2, Paul L Gribble1,3,4,5, Jörn Diedrichsen1,6,7.   

Abstract

Actions involving fine control of the hand, for example, grasping an object, rely heavily on sensory information from the fingertips. Although the integration of feedback during the execution of individual movements is well understood, less is known about the use of sensory feedback in the control of skilled movement sequences. To address this gap, we trained participants to produce sequences of finger movements on a keyboard-like device over a 4-day training period. Participants received haptic, visual, and auditory feedback indicating the occurrence of each finger press. We then either transiently delayed or advanced the feedback for a single press by a small amount of time (30 or 60 ms). We observed that participants rapidly adjusted their ongoing finger press by either accelerating or prolonging the ongoing press, in accordance with the direction of the perturbation. Furthermore, we could show that this rapid behavioral modulation was driven by haptic feedback. Although these feedback-driven adjustments reduced in size with practice, they were still clearly present at the end of training. In contrast to the directionally specific effect we observed on the perturbed press, a feedback perturbation resulted in a delayed onset of the subsequent presses irrespective of perturbation direction or feedback modality. This observation is consistent with a hierarchical organization of even very skilled and fast movement sequences, with different levels reacting distinctly to sensory perturbations.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sensory feedback is important during the execution of a movement. However, little is known about how sensory feedback is used during the production of movement sequences. Here, we show two distinct feedback processes in the execution of fast finger movement sequences. By transiently delaying or advancing the feedback of a single press within a sequence, we observed a directionally specific effect on the perturbed press and a directionally non-specific effect on the subsequent presses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  finger movements; haptic feedback; motor learning; movement sequences; sensory feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35235441      PMCID: PMC8957329          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00319.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target.

Authors:  B L Day; I N Lyon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Post-error slowing: an orienting account.

Authors:  Wim Notebaert; Femke Houtman; Filip Van Opstal; Wim Gevers; Wim Fias; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-03-12

3.  Effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on sequence production.

Authors:  J D Kulpa; Peter Q Pfordresher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Role of auditory feedback in the control of successive keystrokes during piano playing.

Authors:  Shinichi Furuya; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  A Functional Taxonomy of Bottom-Up Sensory Feedback Processing for Motor Actions.

Authors:  Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements.

Authors:  J Pratt; A L Chasteen; R A Abrams
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1994-06

7.  Effector-independent motor sequence representations exist in extrinsic and intrinsic reference frames.

Authors:  Tobias Wiestler; Sheena Waters-Metenier; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Post-error slowing in sequential action: an aging study.

Authors:  Marit F L Ruitenberg; Elger L Abrahamse; Elian De Kleine; Willem B Verwey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-18

9.  Context specificity of post-error and post-conflict cognitive control adjustments.

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Raymond Y Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chunking improves symbolic sequence processing and relies on working memory gating mechanisms.

Authors:  Oleg Solopchuk; Andrea Alamia; Etienne Olivier; Alexandre Zénon
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.