Literature DB >> 18259598

Speech Rate Modification and Its Effects on Fluency Reversal in Fluent Speakers and People Who Stutter.

Peter Howell1, Stevie Sackin.   

Abstract

A theory has been proposed recently that asserts that the problem that people who stutter have arises when these speakers attempt to execute speech at a faster rate than planning processes allow. This leads speakers to complete words before the following one is ready. Plan unavailability usually happens on the more complex content words rather than the relatively simple function words. There are two ways of dealing with this situation when it arises. Speakers can (1) delay production of a content word by repeating prior function words or (2) carry on and attempt to produce the following content word and gamble that the remainder of the plan arrives while it is being executed. The former strategy does not lead speakers to persist in their dysfluency, while the latter does. It is proposed that the pressure on speech rate that leads speakers to adopt the latter strategy is particularly acute around adolescence. In this article two experiments are reported which test the effects of rate on fluency. In Experiment 1, fluent speakers are induced to produce stuttering-like dysfluencies on content words using a commentary task. A prediction of the theory is that procedures known to induce fluency have to produce local slowing of speech so that planning and execution can get back in synchrony. This prediction is confirmed for frequency-shifted feedback and when speakers who stutter have to sing in Experiment 2. Results are discussed in terms of the model for the etiology of stuttering based on plan unavailability. The implications of the results are also discussed with respect to the diagnosis of the disorder and how it can be treated.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 18259598      PMCID: PMC2231598          DOI: 10.1023/a:1009428029167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dev Phys Disabil        ISSN: 1056-263X


  25 in total

1.  Auditory backward-masking performance by children who stutter and its relation to dysfluency rate.

Authors:  P Howell; S Rosen; G Hannigan; L Rustin
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2000-04

2.  Experiments upon the total inhibition of stammering by external control, and some clinical results.

Authors:  C CHERRY; B M SAYERS
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Detection Of Supralexical Dysfluencies In A Text Read By Children Who Stutter.

Authors:  Peter Howell; James Au-Yeung; Stevie Sackin; Kazan Glenn
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 2.538

Review 4.  A theory of neuropsycholinguistic function in stuttering.

Authors:  W H Perkins; R D Kent; R F Curlee
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

5.  A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering.

Authors:  P T Fox; R J Ingham; J C Ingham; T B Hirsch; J H Downs; C Martin; P Jerabek; T Glass; J L Lancaster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An interpretation of research of feedback interruption in speech.

Authors:  G J Borden
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Grammatical function in relation to stuttering in young children.

Authors:  O Bloodstein; B F Gantwerk
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1967-12

8.  Fluency effect of frequency alterations of plus/minus one-half and one-quarter octave shifts in auditory feedback of people who stutter.

Authors:  A Stuart; J Kalinowski; J Armson; R Stenstrom; K Jones
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-04

9.  Methods of interval selection, presence of noise and their effects on detectability of repetitions and prolongations.

Authors:  P Howell; A Staveley; S Sackin; L Rustin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Utterance rate and linguistic properties as determinants of lexical dysfluencies in children who stutter.

Authors:  P Howell; J Au-Yeung; L Pilgrim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  Rates of Typical Disfluency in the Conversational Speech of 30-Month-Old Spanish-English Simultaneous Bilinguals.

Authors:  Shelley B Brundage; Hannah Rowe
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Effect of Speaking Environment on Speech Production and Perception.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  J Hum Environ Syst       Date:  2008-11

3.  Auditory Masking Effects on Speech Fluency in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia: Comparison to Altered Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Facilities to assist people to research into stammered speech.

Authors:  Peter Howell; Mark Huckvale
Journal:  Stammering Res       Date:  2004-07-01

5.  Timing interference to speech in altered listening conditions.

Authors:  Peter Howell; Stevie Sackin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback and frequency-shifted feedback on speech control and some potentials for future development of prosthetic aids for stammering.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Stammering Res       Date:  2004-04-01

7.  Assessment of Some Contemporary Theories of Stuttering That Apply to Spontaneous Speech.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord       Date:  2004

8.  Strength of German accent under altered auditory feedback.

Authors:  P Howell; K Dworzynski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

9.  Lexical priming of function words and content words with children who do, and do not, stutter.

Authors:  Ceri Savage; Peter Howell
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  Suggestions for improving the long-term effects of treatments for stuttering: A Review and synthesis of frequency-shifted feedback and operant techniques.

Authors:  Phil Reed; Peter Howell
Journal:  Eur J Behav Anal       Date:  2000-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.