Literature DB >> 18258226

Give and take: syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension.

Malathi Thothathiri1, Jesse Snedeker.   

Abstract

Syntactic priming during language production is pervasive and well-studied. Hearing, reading, speaking or writing a sentence with a given structure increases the probability of subsequently producing the same structure, regardless of whether the prime and target share lexical content. In contrast, syntactic priming during comprehension has proven more elusive, fueling claims that comprehension is less dependent on general syntactic representations and more dependent on lexical knowledge. In three experiments we explored syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Participants acted out double-object (DO) or prepositional-object (PO) dative sentences while their eye movements were recorded. Prime sentences used different verbs and nouns than the target sentences. In target sentences, the onset of the direct-object noun was consistent with both an animate recipient and an inanimate theme, creating a temporary ambiguity in the argument structure of the verb (DO e.g., Show the horse the book; PO e.g., Show the horn to the dog). We measured the difference in looks to the potential recipient and the potential theme during the ambiguous interval. In all experiments, participants who heard DO primes showed a greater preference for the recipient over the theme than those who heard PO primes, demonstrating across-verb priming during online language comprehension. These results accord with priming found in production studies, indicating a role for abstract structural information during comprehension as well as production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18258226     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  29 in total

1.  The effect of Zipfian frequency variations on category formation in adult artificial language learning.

Authors:  Kathryn D Schuler; Patricia A Reeder; Elissa L Newport; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 2.  Structural priming: a critical review.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Shared abstract representation of linguistic structure in bilingual sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Evan Kidd; Emilie Tennant; Sanjo Nitschke
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

4.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

Authors:  Ariel N James; Scott H Fraundorf; Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Neural Measures Reveal Implicit Learning during Language Processing.

Authors:  Laura J Batterink; Larry Y Cheng; Ken A Paller
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Priming of Early Closure: Evidence for the Lexical Boost during Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Evidence for Priming Across Intervening Sentences During On-Line Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Kristen M Tooley; Tamara Y Swaab; Megan A Boudewyn; Megan Zirnstein; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01

8.  Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Melissa Troyer; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2014-12-08

9.  On the parity of structural persistence in language production and comprehension.

Authors:  Kristen M Tooley; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-05-04

10.  Implicit learning of structure occurs in parallel with lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Kristen M Tooley; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.