Literature DB >> 27243616

Neural Measures Reveal Implicit Learning during Language Processing.

Laura J Batterink1, Larry Y Cheng1, Ken A Paller1.   

Abstract

Language input is highly variable; phonological, lexical, and syntactic features vary systematically across different speakers, geographic regions, and social contexts. Previous evidence shows that language users are sensitive to these contextual changes and that they can rapidly adapt to local regularities. For example, listeners quickly adjust to accented speech, facilitating comprehension. It has been proposed that this type of adaptation is a form of implicit learning. This study examined a similar type of adaptation, syntactic adaptation, to address two issues: (1) whether language comprehenders are sensitive to a subtle probabilistic contingency between an extraneous feature (font color) and syntactic structure and (2) whether this sensitivity should be attributed to implicit learning. Participants read a large set of sentences, 40% of which were garden-path sentences containing temporary syntactic ambiguities. Critically, but unbeknownst to participants, font color probabilistically predicted the presence of a garden-path structure, with 75% of garden-path sentences (and 25% of normative sentences) appearing in a given font color. ERPs were recorded during sentence processing. Almost all participants indicated no conscious awareness of the relationship between font color and sentence structure. Nonetheless, after sufficient time to learn this relationship, ERPs time-locked to the point of syntactic ambiguity resolution in garden-path sentences differed significantly as a function of font color. End-of-sentence grammaticality judgments were also influenced by font color, suggesting that a match between font color and sentence structure increased processing fluency. Overall, these findings indicate that participants can implicitly detect subtle co-occurrences between physical features of sentences and abstract, syntactic properties, supporting the notion that implicit learning mechanisms are generally operative during online language processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27243616      PMCID: PMC5125623          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  34 in total

1.  Structural priming as implicit learning: a comparison of models of sentence production.

Authors:  F Chang; G S Dell; K Bock; Z M Griffin
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  P Hagoort; C M Brown
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production.

Authors:  Kathryn Bock; Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang; Kristine H Onishi
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-09-14

5.  Violations of implicit rules elicit an early negativity in the event-related potential.

Authors:  Andrea Schankin; Dirk Hagemann; Daniel Danner; Marieke Hager
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Event-related brain potentials and human language.

Authors:  L Osterhout; J McLaughlin; M Bersick
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning.

Authors:  K B Baldwin; M Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Implicit learning.

Authors:  C A Seger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Memory for syntax despite amnesia.

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira; Kathryn Bock; Michael P Wilson; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-09

10.  Give and take: syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Malathi Thothathiri; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-02-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Implicit and explicit learning in talker identification.

Authors:  Jayden J Lee; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.