Literature DB >> 24728130

Response interference in touch, vision, and crossmodally: beyond the spatial dimension.

Frank Mast1, Christian Frings, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

To date, tactile distractor processing has primarily been investigated by focusing on the spatial characteristics of distractors and the impact of their presentation on the orienting of attention. In two experiments, we examined the influence of tactile distractors when the location of stimulus presentation was kept constant, thus controlling for the effects of spatial attention. A response priming paradigm was used in which two stimuli were sequentially presented from the same (fixated) direction. Typically, target responses are facilitated when the previously presented distractor (i.e., the prime) happens to map on to the same response as compared to the distractor maps on to the opposite response. Similar response priming effects were observed for tactile and visual distractors within a unimodal experimental setting (Experiments 1a and 1b). Interestingly, however, when the targets and distractors were presented in different sensory modalities, only the visual distractors exerted a crossmodal effect on the subsequent processing of vibrotactile targets (Experiment 2). These results therefore indicate that visual stimuli automatically trigger their corresponding response even when the task at hand is not visual, whereas tactile stimuli are only processed up to the level of response generation when the participants' task is tactile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24728130     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3929-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Behavioral evidence for task-dependent "what" versus "where" processing within and across modalities.

Authors:  Jason S Chan; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-01

2.  Double dissociation of 'what' and 'where' processing in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Stephen G Lomber; Shveta Malhotra
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Imaging unconscious semantic priming.

Authors:  S Dehaene; L Naccache; G Le Clec'H; E Koechlin; M Mueller; G Dehaene-Lambertz; P F van de Moortele; D Le Bihan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  M Eimer; F Schlaghecken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Detection threshold differences to crossed and uncrossed disparities.

Authors:  M L Manning; D C Finlay; R A Neill; B G Frost
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Mechanisms of subliminal response priming.

Authors:  Andrea Kiesel; Wilfried Kunde; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

Review 8.  Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integration? Evaluating the spatial rule.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Dos and don'ts in response priming research.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Anke Haberkamp; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-22

10.  The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence; Peter C Hansen; Clare E Mackay; Gemma A Calvert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Deaf, blind or deaf-blind: Is touch enhanced?

Authors:  Costanza Papagno; Carlo Cecchetto; Alberto Pisoni; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Creating a network of importance: The particular effects of self-relevance on stimulus processing.

Authors:  Sarah Schäfer; Dirk Wentura; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.