Literature DB >> 22390296

Object-based attention overrides perceptual load to modulate visual distraction.

Joshua D Cosman1, Shaun P Vecera.   

Abstract

The ability to ignore task-irrelevant information and overcome distraction is central to our ability to efficiently carry out a number of tasks. One factor shown to strongly influence distraction is the perceptual load of the task being performed; as the perceptual load of task-relevant information processing increases, the likelihood that task-irrelevant information will be processed and interfere with task performance decreases. However, it has also been demonstrated that other attentional factors play an important role in whether or not distracting information affects performance. Specifically, object-based attention can modulate the extent of distractor processing, leaving open the possibility that object-based attention mechanisms may directly modulate the way in which perceptual load affects distractor processing. Here, we show that object-based attention dominates perceptual load to determine the extent of task-irrelevant information processing, with distractors affecting performance only when they are contained within the same object as the task-relevant search display. These results suggest that object-based attention effects play a central role in selective attention regardless of the perceptual load of the task being performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22390296      PMCID: PMC3924541          DOI: 10.1037/a0027406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  22 in total

1.  Frames of reference in unilateral neglect and visual perception: a computational perspective.

Authors:  Michael C Mozer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Object attention revisited: identifying mechanisms and boundary conditions.

Authors:  Songmei Han; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11

3.  Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors.

Authors:  G C Baylis; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

4.  Attentional capture by motion onsets is modulated by perceptual load.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

6.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task.

Authors:  G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 8.  Strategies and models of selective attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.

Authors:  N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Does visual attention select objects or locations?

Authors:  S P Vecera; M J Farah
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-06
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Perceptual load in sport and the heuristic value of the perceptual load paradigm in examining expertise-related perceptual-cognitive adaptations.

Authors:  Philip Furley; Daniel Memmert; Simone Schmid
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-10-10

3.  The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Bo Youn Park; Sujin Kim; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Preserved sensory processing but hampered conflict detection when stimulus input is task-irrelevant.

Authors:  Tristan Bekinschtein; Simon van Gaal; Stijn Adriaan Nuiten; Andrés Canales-Johnson; Lola Beerendonk; Nutsa Nanuashvili; Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Target-flanker similarity effects reflect image segmentation not perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Sihan He; Qingzi Zheng; J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.

Authors:  Carmel Mevorach; Yehoshua Tsal; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-10

7.  Attention modulates incidental memory encoding of human movements.

Authors:  Shiau-Chuen Chiou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-02-28

8.  Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-07

9.  Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load.

Authors:  Hanna Benoni; Yehoshua Tsal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-13

10.  I Thought I Saw "Zorro": An Inattentional Blindness Study.

Authors:  Bahadır Oktay; Banu Cangöz
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.339

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.