Literature DB >> 26232190

Unraveling the sub-processes of selective attention: insights from dynamic modeling and continuous behavior.

Simon Frisch1, Maja Dshemuchadse2, Max Görner2, Thomas Goschke2, Stefan Scherbaum2.   

Abstract

Selective attention biases information processing toward stimuli that are relevant for achieving our goals. However, the nature of this bias is under debate: Does it solely rely on the amplification of goal-relevant information or is there a need for additional inhibitory processes that selectively suppress currently distracting information? Here, we explored the processes underlying selective attention with a dynamic, modeling-based approach that focuses on the continuous evolution of behavior over time. We present two dynamic neural field models incorporating the diverging theoretical assumptions. Simulations with both models showed that they make similar predictions with regard to response times but differ markedly with regard to their continuous behavior. Human data observed via mouse tracking as a continuous measure of performance revealed evidence for the model solely based on amplification but no indication of persisting selective distracter inhibition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive inhibition; Dynamic neural fields; Mouse tracking; Selective attention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26232190     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-015-0666-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  21 in total

1.  How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  How decisions evolve: the temporal dynamics of action selection.

Authors:  Stefan Scherbaum; Maja Dshemuchadse; Rico Fischer; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-03-15

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields.

Authors:  S Amari
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1977-08-03       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  On the fate of distractor representations.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Dirk Wentura; Peter Wühr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  The place of modeling in cognitive science.

Authors:  James L McClelland
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-01

Review 7.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  A layered neural architecture for the consolidation, maintenance, and updating of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Making decisions with a continuous mind.

Authors:  S Scherbaum; M Dshemuchadse; A Kalis
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  A hierarchy of time-scales and the brain.

Authors:  Stefan J Kiebel; Jean Daunizeau; Karl J Friston
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  4 in total

1.  The test of both worlds: identifying feature binding and control processes in congruency sequence tasks by means of action dynamics.

Authors:  Stefan Scherbaum; Simon Frisch; Maja Dshemuchadse; Matthias Rudolf; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-11-07

2.  Psychometrics of the continuous mind: Measuring cognitive sub-processes via mouse tracking.

Authors:  Stefan Scherbaum; Maja Dshemuchadse
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

3.  Decision landscapes: visualizing mouse-tracking data.

Authors:  A Zgonnikov; A Aleni; P T Piiroinen; D O'Hora; M di Bernardo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Lost to translation: How design factors of the mouse-tracking procedure impact the inference from action to cognition.

Authors:  Tobias Grage; Martin Schoemann; Pascal J Kieslich; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.