Literature DB >> 18247900

Behavioral and physiological correlates of temporal pitch perception in electric and acoustic hearing.

Robert P Carlyon1, Suresh Mahendran, John M Deeks, Christopher J Long, Patrick Axon, David Baguley, Stefan Bleeck, Ian M Winter.   

Abstract

In the "4-6" condition of experiment 1, normal-hearing (NH) listeners compared the pitch of a bandpass-filtered pulse train, whose inter-pulse intervals (IPIs) alternated between 4 and 6 ms, to that of isochronous pulse trains. Consistent with previous results obtained at a lower signal level, the pitch of the 4-6 stimulus corresponded to that of an isochronous pulse train having a period of 5.7 ms-longer than the mean IPI of 5 ms. In other conditions the IPI alternated between 3.5-5.5 and 4.5-6.5 ms. Experiment 2 was similar but presented electric pulse trains to one channel of a cochlear implant. In both cases, as overall IPI increased, the pitch of the alternating-interval stimulus approached that of an isochronous train having a period equal to the mean IPI. Experiment 3 measured compound action potentials (CAPs) to alternating-interval stimuli in guinea pigs and in NH listeners. The CAPs to pulses occurring after 4-ms intervals were smaller than responses to pulses occurring after 6-ms intervals, resulting in a modulated pattern that was independent of overall level. The results are compared to the predictions of a simple model incorporating auditory-nerve (AN) refractoriness, and where pitch is estimated from first-order intervals in the AN response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18247900      PMCID: PMC2279014          DOI: 10.1121/1.2821986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Psychophysical evidence against the autocorrelation theory of auditory temporal processing.

Authors:  C Kaernbach; L Demany
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A possible neurophysiological basis of the octave enlargement effect.

Authors:  M F McKinney; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Exploring the temporal mechanism involved in the pitch of unresolved harmonics.

Authors:  C Kaernbach; C Bering
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Pitch strength of regular-interval click trains with different length "runs" of regular intervals.

Authors:  William A Yost; Dan Mapes-Riordan; William Shofner; Raymond Dye; Stanley Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals.

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.

Authors:  C M McKay; R P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Are cochlear implant patients suffering from perceptual dissonance?

Authors:  Gerald E Loeb
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Recovery of the human compound action potential following prior stimulation.

Authors:  O D Murnane; B A Prieve; E M Relkin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Frequency discrimination of complex tones; assessing the role of component resolvability and temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Helen J Flanagan; Joe Adams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Human auditory nerve compound action potentials and long latency responses.

Authors:  S Mahendran; S Bleeck; I M Winter; D M Baguley; P R Axon; R P Carlyon
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  5 in total

1.  Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; David A Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30

2.  The burst gap is a peripheral temporal code for pitch perception that is shared across audition and touch.

Authors:  Deepak Sharma; Kevin K W Ng; Ingvars Birznieks; Richard M Vickery
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25

4.  Re-examining the upper limit of temporal pitch.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Understanding pitch perception as a hierarchical process with top-down modulation.

Authors:  Emili Balaguer-Ballester; Nicholas R Clark; Martin Coath; Katrin Krumbholz; Susan L Denham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.