OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of job strain on survey response. METHODS: 1,613 health care workers received a self-administered questionnaire. Thirty percent of them completed the survey on personal time without any personal monetary compensation. Working conditions were extracted by job title from the national database O*NET 6.0. Job strain was defined as the ratio of job demands to job control. Two complementary models (multi-level logistic and binomial pseudo Poisson regressions) were used to model individual survey response as a function of individual level demographic variables (age and gender), job-level socioeconomic status (SES) and job strain, and facility type (third level). RESULTS: Survey response was associated with higher SES and with less job strain. The association of SES and survey response was mediated by job strain. CONCLUSION: Employees' exposure to job strain may be an important influence on survey response, at least for workers who are not compensated for their time in completing a survey. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of job strain on survey response. METHODS: 1,613 health care workers received a self-administered questionnaire. Thirty percent of them completed the survey on personal time without any personal monetary compensation. Working conditions were extracted by job title from the national database O*NET 6.0. Job strain was defined as the ratio of job demands to job control. Two complementary models (multi-level logistic and binomial pseudo Poisson regressions) were used to model individual survey response as a function of individual level demographic variables (age and gender), job-level socioeconomic status (SES) and job strain, and facility type (third level). RESULTS: Survey response was associated with higher SES and with less job strain. The association of SES and survey response was mediated by job strain. CONCLUSION: Employees' exposure to job strain may be an important influence on survey response, at least for workers who are not compensated for their time in completing a survey. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: A d'Errico; L Punnett; M Cifuentes; J Boyer; J Tessler; R Gore; P Scollin; C Slatin Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Manuel Cifuentes; Jon Boyer; Rebecca Gore; Angelo d'Errico; Jamie Tessler; Patrick Scollin; Debra Lerner; David Kriebel; Laura Punnett; Craig Slatin Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Teresa Janevic; Linda G Kahn; Paul Landsbergis; Piera M Cirillo; Barbara A Cohn; Xinhua Liu; Pam Factor-Litvak Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Jon Boyer; Monica Galizzi; Manuel Cifuentes; Angelo d'Errico; Rebecca Gore; Laura Punnett; Craig Slatin Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Bethany T Gardner; David A Lombardi; Ann Marie Dale; Alfred Franzblau; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Wendell C Taylor; Raheem J Paxton; Ross Shegog; Sharon P Coan; Allison Dubin; Timothy F Page; David M Rempel Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Munirah Ismail; Kun Yun Lee; Afandy Sutrisno Tanjung; Ida Anum Ahmad Jelani; Rabiah Abdul Latiff; Hashimah Abdul Razak; Nor Izzah Ahmad Shauki Journal: Asia Pac Psychiatry Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 2.538