BACKGROUND: Imputed job characteristics had been used as proxy of exposure to working conditions. O*NET database provides job information that could be useful to evaluate psychosocial working conditions. METHODS: Consistency and total agreement between O*NET and self-reported psychosocial exposure (demand/control (DC), effort/reward (ER) proxy models, and emotional labor scale) were compared between healthcare specific (12 occupations, 215 workers) and other jobs (12 occupations, 146 workers). RESULTS: For dimensions of the DC and ER models, Spearman correlation and ICC coefficients were, in general, consistently high (ICC = 0.61 for decision latitude, 0.41 for rewards, 0.53 for ER ratio, and lower for others), particularly in the healthcare specific jobs. CONCLUSION: O*NET and questionnaire based psychosocial indicators showed a good job level agreement particularly on healthcare specific jobs. O*NET may be a useful source of job level psychosocial exposure, especially for the DC and ER models, for healthcare occupations within these types of facilities.
BACKGROUND: Imputed job characteristics had been used as proxy of exposure to working conditions. O*NET database provides job information that could be useful to evaluate psychosocial working conditions. METHODS: Consistency and total agreement between O*NET and self-reported psychosocial exposure (demand/control (DC), effort/reward (ER) proxy models, and emotional labor scale) were compared between healthcare specific (12 occupations, 215 workers) and other jobs (12 occupations, 146 workers). RESULTS: For dimensions of the DC and ER models, Spearman correlation and ICC coefficients were, in general, consistently high (ICC = 0.61 for decision latitude, 0.41 for rewards, 0.53 for ER ratio, and lower for others), particularly in the healthcare specific jobs. CONCLUSION: O*NET and questionnaire based psychosocial indicators showed a good job level agreement particularly on healthcare specific jobs. O*NET may be a useful source of job level psychosocial exposure, especially for the DC and ER models, for healthcare occupations within these types of facilities.
Authors: Manuel Cifuentes; Jon Boyer; Rebecca Gore; Angelo d'Errico; Patrick Scollin; Jamie Tessler; Debra Lerner; David Kriebel; Laura Punnett; Craig Slatin Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Laura A Fraade-Blanar; Jeanne M Sears; Kwun Chuen G Chan; Hilaire J Thompson; Paul K Crane; Beth E Ebel Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Jonathan Davis; Corinne Peek-Asa; Ann Marie Dale; Ling Zhang; Carri Casteel; Cara Hamann; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 3.079
Authors: Kaori Fujishiro; Ana V Diez-Roux; Paul A Landsbergis; Nancy Swords Jenny; Teresa Seeman Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-05-18 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Kaori Fujishiro; Ana V Diez Roux; Paul Landsbergis; Joel D Kaufman; Claudia E Korcarz; James H Stein Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Anne M Gadermann; Steven G Heeringa; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Lisa J Colpe; Carol S Fullerton; Stephen E Gilman; Michael J Gruber; Matthew K Nock; Anthony J Rosellini; Nancy A Sampson; Michael Schoenbaum; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Mil Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Jon Boyer; Monica Galizzi; Manuel Cifuentes; Angelo d'Errico; Rebecca Gore; Laura Punnett; Craig Slatin Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Bethany T Gardner; David A Lombardi; Ann Marie Dale; Alfred Franzblau; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Conglong Wang; Félice Lê-Scherban; Jennifer Taylor; Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher; Matthew Allison; David Gefen; Lucy Robinson; Yvonne L Michael Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 5.501