Literature DB >> 28890281

Participation in a US community-based cardiovascular health study: investigating nonrandom selection effects related to employment, perceived stress, work-related stress, and family caregiving.

Leslie A MacDonald1, Kaori Fujishiro2, Virginia J Howard3, Paul Landsbergis4, Misty J Hein2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Participation in health studies may be inversely associated with employment and stress. We investigated whether employment, perceived stress, work-related stress, and family caregiving were related to participation in a longitudinal US community-based health study of black and white men and women aged ≥45 years.
METHODS: Prevalence ratios and confidence intervals were estimated for completion of the second stage (S2) of a two-stage enrollment process by employment (status, type), and stress (perceived stress, work-related stress, caregiving), adjusting for age, sex, race, region, income, and education. Eligibility and consent for a follow-up occupational survey were similarly evaluated.
RESULTS: Wage- but not self-employed participants were less likely than the unemployed to complete S2. Among the employed, S2 completion did not vary by stress; however, family caregivers with a short time burden of care (<2 hour/d) were more likely to complete S2, compared to noncaregivers. Eligibility and participation in the follow-up occupational survey were higher among those employed (vs. unemployed) at enrollment but were not associated with enrollment stress levels.
CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence of selection bias was seen by employment and stress within a large US community-based cohort, but findings suggest the need for enrollment procedures to consider possible barriers to participation among wage-employed individuals. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caregivers; Employment; Psychological stress; Selection bias

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28890281      PMCID: PMC5632192          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  26 in total

1.  Covariation between workplace physical and psychosocial stressors: evidence and implications for occupational health research and prevention.

Authors:  L A MacDonald; R A Karasek; L Punnett; T Scharf
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-06-10       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Bias in occupational epidemiology studies.

Authors:  Neil Pearce; Harvey Checkoway; David Kriebel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  A conceptual model of work and health disparities in the United States.

Authors:  Hester J Lipscomb; Dana Loomis; Mary Anne McDonald; Robin A Argue; Steve Wing
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.663

Review 4.  Occupation as socioeconomic status or environmental exposure? A survey of practice among population-based cardiovascular studies in the United States.

Authors:  Leslie A MacDonald; Alex Cohen; Sherry Baron; Cecil M Burchfiel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Non-response in a survey of cardiovascular risk factors in the Dutch population: determinants and resulting biases.

Authors:  H C Boshuizen; A L Viet; H S J Picavet; A Botterweck; A J M van Loon
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.427

6.  The reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study: objectives and design.

Authors:  Virginia J Howard; Mary Cushman; Leavonne Pulley; Camilo R Gomez; Rodney C Go; Ronald J Prineas; Andra Graham; Claudia S Moy; George Howard
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

8.  Disparities in stroke incidence contributing to disparities in stroke mortality.

Authors:  Virginia J Howard; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Suzanne E Judd; Leslie A McClure; Monika M Safford; J David Rhodes; Mary Cushman; Claudia S Moy; Elsayed Z Soliman; Brett M Kissela; George Howard
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study.

Authors:  R Schulz; S R Beach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Communicating risks after exposure has ended: former workers' perspectives on PCBs.

Authors:  Kaori Fujishiro; Amy Mobley; Everett Lehman
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2013-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.