N Hoeymans1, E J Feskens, G A Van Den Bos, D Kromhout. 1. Department of Chronic Diseases and Environmental Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Nancy.Hoeymans@rivm.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate to what extent differences in health status between respondents and drop-outs affected the associations between cardiovascular diseases and functional status and self-rated health in a population-based longitudinal health survey in elderly men. METHODS: During the 1993 survey of the Zutphen Elderly Study, a non-response survey was carried out. The prevalence of myocardial infarction and stroke, disabilities in basic activities of daily living (BADL) and mobility, and self-rated health were compared between non-respondents (n = 99) and respondents (n = 381). Associations between myocardial infarction and stroke on the one hand and functional status and self-rated health on the other were calculated for the total population and for the respondents to assess the amount of under- or overestimation of these associations. RESULTS: The health of non-respondents was worse than that of respondents in terms of stroke, disabilities in BADL and mobility and self-rated health. Due to this selective non-response, the associations between cardiovascular diseases and functional status and self-rated health were biased. Although most of the associations were slightly overestimated, the most important bias was the underestimation by 57% of the association between stroke and disabilities in BADL [total population: odds ratios (OR) = 6.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.7-13.9; respondents only: OR = 2.6, CI = 0.7-9.9]. CONCLUSION: Selective non-response might lead to bias in the prevalence of disease, disabilities and self-rated health as well as in the associations between disease and functional status and self-rated health. The direction and magnitude of this bias varies according to type of disease and health outcome and is therefore difficult to predict. The need to minimize non-response and to investigate its implications is recommended in every study.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate to what extent differences in health status between respondents and drop-outs affected the associations between cardiovascular diseases and functional status and self-rated health in a population-based longitudinal health survey in elderly men. METHODS: During the 1993 survey of the Zutphen Elderly Study, a non-response survey was carried out. The prevalence of myocardial infarction and stroke, disabilities in basic activities of daily living (BADL) and mobility, and self-rated health were compared between non-respondents (n = 99) and respondents (n = 381). Associations between myocardial infarction and stroke on the one hand and functional status and self-rated health on the other were calculated for the total population and for the respondents to assess the amount of under- or overestimation of these associations. RESULTS: The health of non-respondents was worse than that of respondents in terms of stroke, disabilities in BADL and mobility and self-rated health. Due to this selective non-response, the associations between cardiovascular diseases and functional status and self-rated health were biased. Although most of the associations were slightly overestimated, the most important bias was the underestimation by 57% of the association between stroke and disabilities in BADL [total population: odds ratios (OR) = 6.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.7-13.9; respondents only: OR = 2.6, CI = 0.7-9.9]. CONCLUSION: Selective non-response might lead to bias in the prevalence of disease, disabilities and self-rated health as well as in the associations between disease and functional status and self-rated health. The direction and magnitude of this bias varies according to type of disease and health outcome and is therefore difficult to predict. The need to minimize non-response and to investigate its implications is recommended in every study.
Authors: C M Plevier; J M Mooy; P J Marang-Van de Mheen; M E Stouthard; M C Visser; D E Grobbee; L J Gunning-Schepers Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2001 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Manuel Cifuentes; Jon Boyer; Rebecca Gore; Angelo d'Errico; Patrick Scollin; Jamie Tessler; Debra Lerner; David Kriebel; Laura Punnett; Craig Slatin Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Ashli A Owen-Smith; David H Smith; Cynthia S Rand; Jeffrey O Tom; Reesa Laws; Amy Waterbury; Andrew Williams; William M Vollmer Journal: Perm J Date: 2016-06-29
Authors: E K Osnes; C M Lofthus; H E Meyer; J A Falch; L Nordsletten; I Cappelen; I S Kristiansen Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.507