Literature DB >> 9504364

Non-response bias in a study of cardiovascular diseases, functional status and self-rated health among elderly men.

N Hoeymans1, E J Feskens, G A Van Den Bos, D Kromhout.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate to what extent differences in health status between respondents and drop-outs affected the associations between cardiovascular diseases and functional status and self-rated health in a population-based longitudinal health survey in elderly men.
METHODS: During the 1993 survey of the Zutphen Elderly Study, a non-response survey was carried out. The prevalence of myocardial infarction and stroke, disabilities in basic activities of daily living (BADL) and mobility, and self-rated health were compared between non-respondents (n = 99) and respondents (n = 381). Associations between myocardial infarction and stroke on the one hand and functional status and self-rated health on the other were calculated for the total population and for the respondents to assess the amount of under- or overestimation of these associations.
RESULTS: The health of non-respondents was worse than that of respondents in terms of stroke, disabilities in BADL and mobility and self-rated health. Due to this selective non-response, the associations between cardiovascular diseases and functional status and self-rated health were biased. Although most of the associations were slightly overestimated, the most important bias was the underestimation by 57% of the association between stroke and disabilities in BADL [total population: odds ratios (OR) = 6.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.7-13.9; respondents only: OR = 2.6, CI = 0.7-9.9].
CONCLUSION: Selective non-response might lead to bias in the prevalence of disease, disabilities and self-rated health as well as in the associations between disease and functional status and self-rated health. The direction and magnitude of this bias varies according to type of disease and health outcome and is therefore difficult to predict. The need to minimize non-response and to investigate its implications is recommended in every study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9504364     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/27.1.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  39 in total

1.  Persistent impaired emotional functioning in survivors of a myocardial infarction?

Authors:  C M Plevier; J M Mooy; P J Marang-Van de Mheen; M E Stouthard; M C Visser; D E Grobbee; L J Gunning-Schepers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Patterns of unit and item nonresponse in the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Carol Edwards; January Angeles; Katrin Hambarsoomians; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Job strain predicts survey response in healthcare industry workers.

Authors:  Manuel Cifuentes; Jon Boyer; Rebecca Gore; Angelo d'Errico; Patrick Scollin; Jamie Tessler; Debra Lerner; David Kriebel; Laura Punnett; Craig Slatin
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Difference in Effectiveness of Medication Adherence Intervention by Health Literacy Level.

Authors:  Ashli A Owen-Smith; David H Smith; Cynthia S Rand; Jeffrey O Tom; Reesa Laws; Amy Waterbury; Andrew Williams; William M Vollmer
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2016-06-29

5.  Responders versus nonresponders in a dementia study of the oldest old: the 90+ study.

Authors:  Annlia Paganini-Hill; Beverly Ducey; Marian Hawk
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Brian E Clauser; Terry Field; Robert A Yood; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Physical functioning in elderly Europeans: 10 year changes in the north and south: the HALE project.

Authors:  Sinikka Aijänseppä; Irma-Leena Notkola; Marja Tijhuis; Wija van Staveren; Daan Kromhout; Aulikki Nissinen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Health and demographic characteristics of respondents in an Australian national sexuality survey: comparison with population norms.

Authors:  D M Purdie; M P Dunne; F M Boyle; M D Cook; J M Najman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg.

Authors:  Ala'a Alkerwi; Nicolas Sauvageot; Sophie Couffignal; Adelin Albert; Marie-Lise Lair; Michèle Guillaume
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Consequences of hip fracture on activities of daily life and residential needs.

Authors:  E K Osnes; C M Lofthus; H E Meyer; J A Falch; L Nordsletten; I Cappelen; I S Kristiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.