Literature DB >> 18246394

Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004.

Jason A Kemp1, Samuel R G Finlayson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past 5 years, several studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic colon resection is an acceptable and perhaps preferable alternative to open resection for both benign diseases and cancer. The extent to which laparoscopic colon resections are used nationally is not known.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify laparoscopic and open elective colon resections performed in the United States each year from 2000 through 2004. The trends in adoption of the laparoscopic technique for each type of colon resection and for the most common diagnoses were identified, and differences in patient and provider characteristics were examined.
RESULTS: From 2000 to 2004, the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically increased from 3% to 6.5%. The proportion performed for cancer increased from 1.4% to 4.3%, and for benign disease from 4.6% to 8.2%. Patients treated laparoscopically tended to be younger (median age, 61 years vs 66 years; p < 0.001) and to have fewer comorbidities (Charlson score of zero for 58.1% vs 37%; p < 0.001). Laparoscopic colon resections were more widely adopted in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals (5.1% vs 3.7%; p < 0.001) and in urban versus rural hospitals (4.7% vs 2.2%; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Although the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically increased in the first half of this decade, it has remained very low. This trend is similar across procedure types and diagnoses. It remains to be seen whether greater patient demand and more recent trials will result in wider adoption of the laparoscopic approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18246394     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9732-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Trends in adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rural versus urban hospitals.

Authors:  Jason A Kemp; Randall S Zuckerman; Samuel R G Finlayson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and wound recurrence.

Authors:  R J Alexander; B C Jaques; K G Mitchell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-23       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Nitin Jain; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11
View more
  32 in total

1.  Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Robin High; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Need for simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-27

3.  Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Richard Billingham; Ellen Farrokhi; Michael Florence; Daniel Herzig; Karen Horvath; Terry Rogers; Scott Steele; Rebecca Symons; Richard Thirlby; Mark Whiteford; David R Flum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Cost savings for elective laparoscopic resection compared with open resection for colorectal cancer in a region of high uptake.

Authors:  Bridie S Thompson; Michael D Coory; Louisa G Gordon; John W Lumley
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The case for minimally invasive surgery in colorectal cancer and the development of a program for such surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Albo
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

6.  Reduced perioperative death following laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of an international observational study.

Authors:  A Munasinghe; B Singh; N Mahmoud; M Joy; D C Chang; F Penninckx; O Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Ilun Yang; Robin P Boushey; Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes.

Authors:  Wissam J Halabi; Celeste Y Kang; Mehraneh D Jafari; Vinh Q Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons' conversion: a study of trends and costs.

Authors:  Priscila R Armijo; Spyridon Pagkratis; Eugene Boilesen; Tiffany Tanner; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Rural residence and cancer outcomes in the United States: issues and challenges.

Authors:  Ashley Meilleur; S V Subramanian; Jesse J Plascak; James L Fisher; Electra D Paskett; Elizabeth B Lamont
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.