Literature DB >> 14609864

Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases.

Ulrich Guller1, Nitin Jain, Sheleika Hervey, Harriett Purves, Ricardo Pietrobon.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic colectomy has significant advantages over open colectomy in the treatment of diverticular disease with respect to the length of hospital stay, routine hospital discharge, and postoperative morbidity and mortality.
DESIGN: Retrospective secondary data analysis. PATIENTS AND
SETTING: Patients with primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes for laparoscopic (709 patients [3.8%]) and open sigmoid resection (17 735 patients [96.2%]) were selected from the 1998, 1999, and 2000 Nationwide Inpatient Samples. These databases represent 20% stratified probability samples of all US community hospital discharges. Sampling weights were used to allow generalization of the study findings to the overall US population. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the risk-adjusted association between the surgery type and patient outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of hospital stay, in-hospital complications, in-hospital mortality, and the rate of routine discharge.
RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 59.8 years; they were preponderantly white (89.1%) and female (54.0%). After adjusting for other covariates, laparoscopic sigmoidectomy was associated with a shorter mean hospital stay (laparoscopic sigmoidectomy vs open sigmoidectomy, 7.47 vs 9.37 days; P<.001), fewer gastrointestinal tract complications (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.93; P =.03), a lower overall complication rate (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.88; P =.007), and a higher routine hospital discharge rate (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-3.21; P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sigmoid resection in patients with diverticular disease has statistically and clinically significant advantages over open sigmoid resection with respect to the length of hospital stay, rate of routine hospital discharge, and postoperative in-hospital morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14609864     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  78 in total

1.  Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery and the impact of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches.

Authors:  John S Mayo; Miriam L Brazer; Kenneth J Bogenberger; Kelli B Tavares; Robert J Conrad; Michael B Lustik; Suzanne M Gillern; Chan W Park; Carly R Richards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Totally laparoscopic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis achieved using a laparoscopic linear stapler: experience of a single institute.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ikeda; Akira Kabasima; Naoyuki Ueda; Yusuke Yonemura; Mizuki Ninomiya; Mako Nogami; Kyuzo Fujii; Kojiro Mashino; Hideya Tashiro; Hisanobu Sakata
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Elective open versus laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis with the Sigma trial.

Authors:  Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Muhammed S Sajid; Kamran Khatri; Elizabeth Cheek; Mirza K Baig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease.

Authors:  Jeremy M Lipman; Harry L Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-08

6.  Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy.

Authors:  Jayleen Grams; Winnie Tong; Alex J Greenstein; Barry Salky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: training the next generation.

Authors:  Seth Miller; Marlin Wayne Causey; Aneel Damle; Justin Maykel; Scott Steele
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis.

Authors:  R S Turley; C R Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of diverticulitis: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ryan S Turley; Andrew S Barbas; Michael E Lidsky; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly; John E Scarborough
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Emergency management of diverticulitis.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.