Literature DB >> 22533998

Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Steve Kwon, Richard Billingham, Ellen Farrokhi, Michael Florence, Daniel Herzig, Karen Horvath, Terry Rogers, Scott Steele, Rebecca Symons, Richard Thirlby, Mark Whiteford, David R Flum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adoption of laparoscopic colon surgery and assess its impact in the community at large. STUDY
DESIGN: The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a quality improvement benchmarking initiative in the Northwest using medical record-based data. We evaluated the use of laparoscopy and a composite of adverse events (ie, death or clinical reintervention) for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at 48 hospitals from the 4th quarter of 2005 through 4th quarter of 2010.
RESULTS: Of the 9,705 patients undergoing elective colorectal operations (mean age 60.6 ± 15.6 years; 55.2% women), 38.0% were performed laparoscopically (17.8% laparoscopic procedures converted to open). The use of laparoscopic procedures increased from 23.3% in 4th quarter of 2005 to 41.6% in 4th quarter of 2010 (trend during study period, p < 0.001). After adjustment (for age, sex, albumin levels, diabetes, body mass index, comorbidity index, cancer diagnosis, year, hospital bed size, and urban vs rural location), the risk of transfusions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.7), wound infections (OR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34-0.61), and composite of adverse events (OR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.79) were all significantly lower with laparoscopy. Within those hospitals that had been in SCOAP since 2006, hospitals where laparoscopy was most commonly used also had a substantial increase in the volume of all types of colon surgery (202 cases per hospital in 2010 from 112 cases per hospital in 2006, an 80.4% increase) and, in particular, the number of resections for noncancer diagnoses and right-sided pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of laparoscopic colorectal resection increased in the Northwest. Increased adoption of laparoscopic colectomies was associated with greater use of all types of colorectal surgery.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22533998      PMCID: PMC3397823          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  40 in total

1.  Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study.

Authors:  L Stocchi; H Nelson; T M Young-Fadok; D R Larson; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; P A Seshadri; M Cadeddu; R Gregoire; E C Poulin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results.

Authors:  Selim Dinçler; Michael T Koller; Johann Steurer; Lucas M Bachmann; Daniel Christen; Peter Buchmann
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Heidi Nelson; Shari Gelber; Daniel Sargent; Georgene Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Utilization of laparoscopic colectomy in the United States before and after the clinical outcomes of surgical therapy study group trial.

Authors:  Jennifer D Rea; Molly M Cone; Brian S Diggs; Karen E Deveney; Kim C Lu; Daniel O Herzig
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Surgical treatment of gallstones: changes in a defined population during a 20-year period.

Authors:  Gunnar E Persson; Axel G B Ros; Anders J G Thulin
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

7.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Nitin Jain; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11

10.  National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgery.

Authors:  S R G Finlayson; W S Laycock; J D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Review of single incision laparoscopic surgery in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Nisreen Madhoun; Deborah S Keller; Eric M Haas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Adoption of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: It Was Quite a Journey.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

3.  The current status of emergent laparoscopic colectomy: a population-based study of clinical and financial outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Rodrigo Pedraza; Juan Ramon Flores-Gonzalez; Jean Paul LeFave; Ali Mahmood; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Fabrizio Luca; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Sabina Cenciarelli; Wanda Petz; Igor Monsellato; Manuela Valvo; Maria Laura Cossu; Tiago Leal Ghezzi; Kassem Shmaissany
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Zheng; Ahmedin Jemal; Chun Chieh Lin; Chung-Yuan Hu; George J Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Ventral hernia repairs in the oldest-old: high-risk regardless of approach.

Authors:  Konstantinos Spaniolas; Thadeus L Trus; Gina L Adrales
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotics and transanal minimal invasive surgery (TAMIS): The "sweet spot" for robotics in colorectal surgery?

Authors:  R Hompes
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Is right colectomy a complete learning procedure for a robotic surgical program?

Authors:  Paolo Raimondi; Francesco Marchegiani; Massimo Cieri; Annadomenica Cichella; Roberto Cotellese; Paolo Innocenti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-05-12

9.  The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Kerrin Palazzi; J Kellogg Parsons; David C Chang; Sonia L Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Surgical Unit volume and 30-day reoperation rate following primary resection for colorectal cancer in the Veneto Region (Italy).

Authors:  S Pucciarelli; A Chiappetta; G Giacomazzo; A Barina; N Gennaro; M Rebonato; D Nitti; M Saugo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.