Literature DB >> 17874370

Male crickets adjust the viability of their sperm in response to female mating status.

Melissa L Thomas1, Leigh W Simmons.   

Abstract

Sperm competition theory predicts that males should allocate sperm according to the number of competing ejaculates. Prudent allocation of sperm in response to different levels of sperm competition has been found across a number of taxa; however, some studies suggest that males may not always allocate sperm as expected. Here we examine sperm allocation in the Australian field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus, using female mating status (virgin, singly mated, or multiply mated) to manipulate male perception of sperm competition risk and intensity. Consistent with theory, we found that male crickets adjust their ejaculates in response to female mating status. However, rather than altering the absolute numbers of sperm transferred to a female, males altered the quality of their sperm. Males ejaculated sperm of low viability (proportion of live vs. dead sperm) when mating with virgins, increased sperm viability when mating with singly mated females, but reduced sperm viability when mating with multiply mated females. Our results show that variation in ejaculate quality can be an important aspect of strategic ejaculation by males and suggest caution in the interpretation of studies in which males do not appear to allocate sperm according to theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17874370     DOI: 10.1086/519404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  23 in total

Review 1.  It's all in your head: the role of quantity estimation in sperm competition.

Authors:  Eran M Shifferman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Immune activation decreases sperm viability in both sexes and influences female sperm storage.

Authors:  Preethi Radhakrishnan; Kenneth M Fedorka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  No postcopulatory response to inbreeding by male crickets.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Melissa L Thomas
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Male crickets adjust ejaculate quality with both risk and intensity of sperm competition.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Amy Denholm; Chantelle Jackson; Esther Levy; Ewa Madon
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  No evidence for sperm priming responses under varying sperm competition risk or intensity in guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-03-24

6.  Male-derived cuticular hydrocarbons signal sperm competition intensity and affect ejaculate expenditure in crickets.

Authors:  Melissa L Thomas; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Socially cued seminal fluid gene expression mediates responses in ejaculate quality to sperm competition risk.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Maxine Lovegrove
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Social manipulation of sperm competition intensity reduces seminal fluid gene expression.

Authors:  Nadia S Sloan; Maxine Lovegrove; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 9.  Post-ejaculatory modifications to sperm (PEMS).

Authors:  Scott Pitnick; Mariana F Wolfner; Steve Dorus
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2019-11-18

10.  Sperm: seminal fluid interactions and the adjustment of sperm quality in relation to female attractiveness.

Authors:  Charlie K Cornwallis; Emily A O'Connor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.