Literature DB >> 18211051

Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.

Steffen Renner1, Swetlana Derksen, Sebastian Radestock, Fabian Mörchen.   

Abstract

Improving the scoring functions for small molecule-protein docking is a highly challenging task in current computational drug design. Here we present a novel consensus scoring concept for the prediction of binding modes for multiple known active ligands. Similar ligands are generally believed to bind to their receptor in a similar fashion. The presumption of our approach was that the true binding modes of similar ligands should be more similar to each other compared to false positive binding modes. The number of conserved (consensus) interactions between similar ligands was used as a docking score. Patterns of interactions were modeled using ligand receptor interaction fingerprints. Our approach was evaluated for four different data sets of known cocrystal structures (CDK-2, dihydrofolate reductase, HIV-1 protease, and thrombin). Docking poses were generated with FlexX and rescored by our approach. For comparison the CScore scoring functions from Sybyl were used, and consensus scores were calculated thereof. Our approach performed better than individual scoring functions and was comparable to consensus scoring. Analysis of the distribution of docking poses by self-organizing maps (SOM) and interaction fingerprints confirmed that clusters of docking poses composed of multiple ligands were preferentially observed near the native binding mode. Being conceptually unrelated to commonly used docking scoring functions our approach provides a powerful method to complement and improve computational docking experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211051     DOI: 10.1021/ci7003626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  14 in total

1.  Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Tim Ten Brink; Fredrick Robin Devadoss Victor Paul Raj; Matthias Keil; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  In-silico approaches to multi-target drug discovery : computer aided multi-target drug design, multi-target virtual screening.

Authors:  Xiao Hua Ma; Zhe Shi; Chunyan Tan; Yuyang Jiang; Mei Lin Go; Boon Chuan Low; Yu Zong Chen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Rapid activity prediction of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors: harnessing docking energetic components for empirical scoring by chemometric and artificial neural network approaches.

Authors:  Patcharapong Thangsunan; Sila Kittiwachana; Puttinan Meepowpan; Nawee Kungwan; Panchika Prangkio; Supa Hannongbua; Nuttee Suree
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Exploring the potential of protein-based pharmacophore models in ligand pose prediction and ranking.

Authors:  Bingjie Hu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Identification of a novel putative inhibitor of the Plasmodium falciparum purine nucleoside phosphorylase: exploring the purine salvage pathway to design new antimalarial drugs.

Authors:  Luciano Porto Kagami; Gustavo Machado das Neves; Ricardo Pereira Rodrigues; Vinicius Barreto da Silva; Vera Lucia Eifler-Lima; Daniel Fábio Kawano
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.943

6.  Implementation and evaluation of a docking-rescoring method using molecular footprint comparisons.

Authors:  Trent E Balius; Sudipto Mukherjee; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: pruning ensembles of receptor structures for increased efficiency and accuracy during docking.

Authors:  Erin S D Bolstad; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-04

8.  Automated site preparation in physics-based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes.

Authors:  Chaya S Rapp; Cheryl Schonbrun; Matthew P Jacobson; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Niu Huang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-10

9.  Contact-based ligand-clustering approach for the identification of active compounds in virtual screening.

Authors:  Alexey B Mantsyzov; Guillaume Bouvier; Nathalie Evrard-Todeschi; Gildas Bertho
Journal:  Adv Appl Bioinform Chem       Date:  2012-09-06

10.  A two-step target binding and selectivity support vector machines approach for virtual screening of dopamine receptor subtype-selective ligands.

Authors:  Jingxian Zhang; Bucong Han; Xiaona Wei; Chunyan Tan; Yuzong Chen; Yuyang Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.