Literature DB >> 23621564

Exploring the potential of protein-based pharmacophore models in ligand pose prediction and ranking.

Bingjie Hu1, Markus A Lill.   

Abstract

Protein-based pharmacophore models derived from protein binding site atoms without the inclusion of any ligand information have become more popular in virtual screening studies. However, the accuracy of protein-based pharmacophore models for reproducing the critical protein-ligand interactions has never been explicitly assessed. In this study, we used known protein-ligand contacts from a large set of experimentally determined protein-ligand complexes to assess the quality of the protein-based pharmacophores in reproducing these critical contacts. We demonstrate how these contacts can be used to optimize the pharmacophore generation procedure to produce pharmacophore models that optimally cover the known protein-ligand interactions. Finally, we explored the potential of the optimized protein-based pharmacophore models for pose prediction and pose rankings. Our results demonstrate that there are significant variations in the success of protein-based pharmacophore models to reproduce native contacts and consequently native ligand poses dependent on the details of the pharmacophore generation process. We show that the generation of optimized protein-based pharmacophore models is a promising approach for ligand pose prediction and pose rankings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23621564      PMCID: PMC3725268          DOI: 10.1021/ci400143r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  24 in total

1.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  LigandScout: 3-D pharmacophores derived from protein-bound ligands and their use as virtual screening filters.

Authors:  Gerhard Wolber; Thierry Langer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Xueliang Fang; Yipin Lu; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult.

Authors:  Jason C Cole; Christopher W Murray; J Willem M Nissink; Richard D Taylor; Robin Taylor
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-08-15

5.  A comparative study on the application of hierarchical-agglomerative clustering approaches to organize outputs of reiterated docking runs.

Authors:  Giovanni Bottegoni; Andrea Cavalli; Maurizio Recanatini
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  PHASE: a new engine for pharmacophore perception, 3D QSAR model development, and 3D database screening: 1. Methodology and preliminary results.

Authors:  Steven L Dixon; Alexander M Smondyrev; Eric H Knoll; Shashidhar N Rao; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Xun Li; Yan Li; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Identification of common functional configurations among molecules.

Authors:  D Barnum; J Greene; A Smellie; P Sprague
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  1996 May-Jun

9.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Automatic identification and representation of protein binding sites for molecular docking.

Authors:  J Ruppert; W Welch; A N Jain
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.725

View more
  8 in total

1.  A pose prediction approach based on ligand 3D shape similarity.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Ultra-High-Throughput Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions.

Authors:  David K Johnson; John Karanicolas
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Development of purely structure-based pharmacophores for the topoisomerase I-DNA-ligand binding pocket.

Authors:  Malgorzata N Drwal; Keli Agama; Yves Pommier; Renate Griffith
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Selectivity by small-molecule inhibitors of protein interactions can be driven by protein surface fluctuations.

Authors:  David K Johnson; John Karanicolas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  PharmDock: a pharmacophore-based docking program.

Authors:  Bingjie Hu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.514

6.  Pharmacophore-based similarity scoring for DOCK.

Authors:  Lingling Jiang; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  PL-PatchSurfer: a novel molecular local surface-based method for exploring protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Bingjie Hu; Xiaolei Zhu; Lyman Monroe; Mark G Bures; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Truly Target-Focused Pharmacophore Modeling: A Novel Tool for Mapping Intermolecular Surfaces.

Authors:  Jérémie Mortier; Pratik Dhakal; Andrea Volkamer
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.