Literature DB >> 21541962

Implementation and evaluation of a docking-rescoring method using molecular footprint comparisons.

Trent E Balius1, Sudipto Mukherjee, Robert C Rizzo.   

Abstract

A docking-rescoring method, based on per-residue van der Waals (VDW), electrostatic (ES), or hydrogen bond (HB) energies has been developed to aid discovery of ligands that have interaction signatures with a target (footprints) similar to that of a reference. Biologically useful references could include known drugs, inhibitors, substrates, transition states, or side-chains that mediate protein-protein interactions. Termed footprint similarity (FPS) score, the method, as implemented in the program DOCK, was validated and characterized using: (1) pose identification, (2) crossdocking, (3) enrichment, and (4) virtual screening. Improvements in pose identification (6–12%) were obtained using footprint-based (FPS(VDW+ES)) vs. standard DOCK (DCE(VDW+ES)) scoring as evaluated on three large datasets (680–775 systems) from the SB2010 database. Enhanced pose identification was also observed using FPS (45.4% or 70.9%) compared with DCE (17.8%) methods to rank challenging crossdocking ensembles from carbonic anhydrase. Enrichment tests, for three representative systems, revealed FPSVDW+ES scoring yields significant early fold enrichment in the top 10% of ranked databases. For EGFR, top FPS poses are nicely accommodated in the molecular envelope defined by the reference in comparison with DCE, which yields distinct molecular weight bias toward larger molecules. Results from a representative virtual screen of ca. 1 million compounds additionally illustrate how ligands with footprints similar to a known inhibitor can readily be identified from within large commercially available databases. By providing an alternative way to rank ligand poses in a simple yet directed manner we anticipate that FPS scoring will be a useful tool for docking and structure-based design. 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Euclidean distance; Pearson correlation; ROC curves; docking; enrichment; molecular fingerprints; molecular footprints; pose comparison; pose rescoring; virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21541962      PMCID: PMC3181325          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  41 in total

1.  Insights into protein-protein binding by binding free energy calculation and free energy decomposition for the Ras-Raf and Ras-RalGDS complexes.

Authors:  Holger Gohlke; Christina Kiel; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  The many roles of computation in drug discovery.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery.

Authors:  I D Kuntz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Origins of Resistance Conferred by the R292K Neuraminidase Mutation via Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Ricky Chachra; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 5.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Expanded interaction fingerprint method for analyzing ligand binding modes in docking and structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Matthew D Kelly; Ricardo L Mancera
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

8.  Position specific interaction dependent scoring technique for virtual screening based on weighted protein--ligand interaction fingerprint profiles.

Authors:  Ravi K Nandigam; Sangtae Kim; Juswinder Singh; Claudio Chuaqui
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Structural basis for inhibition promiscuity of dual specific thrombin and factor Xa blood coagulation inhibitors.

Authors:  H Nar; M Bauer; A Schmid; J M Stassen; W Wienen; H W Priepke; I K Kauffmann; U J Ries; N H Hauel
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2001-01-10       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Molecular insight into the interaction between IFABP and PA by using MM-PBSA and alanine scanning methods.

Authors:  Hanjun Zou; Cheng Luo; Suxin Zheng; Xiaomin Luo; Weiliang Zhu; Kaixian Chen; Jianhua Shen; Hualiang Jiang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  29 in total

1.  The Antinociceptive Agent SBFI-26 Binds to Anandamide Transporters FABP5 and FABP7 at Two Different Sites.

Authors:  Hao-Chi Hsu; Simon Tong; Yuchen Zhou; Matthew W Elmes; Su Yan; Martin Kaczocha; Dale G Deutsch; Robert C Rizzo; Iwao Ojima; Huilin Li
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are intracellular carriers for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD).

Authors:  Matthew W Elmes; Martin Kaczocha; William T Berger; KwanNok Leung; Brian P Ralph; Liqun Wang; Joseph M Sweeney; Jeremy T Miyauchi; Stella E Tsirka; Iwao Ojima; Dale G Deutsch
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Grid-based molecular footprint comparison method for docking and de novo design: application to HIVgp41.

Authors:  Trent E Balius; William J Allen; Sudipto Mukherjee; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Footprint-based identification of viral entry inhibitors targeting HIVgp41.

Authors:  Patrick M Holden; Harmeet Kaur; Rashi Goyal; Miriam Gochin; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Customizable de novo design strategies for DOCK: Application to HIVgp41 and other therapeutic targets.

Authors:  William J Allen; Brian C Fochtman; Trent E Balius; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Assessing and improving the performance of consensus docking strategies using the DockBox package.

Authors:  Jordane Preto; Francesco Gentile
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Docking-based virtual screening of Brazilian natural compounds using the OOMT as the pharmacological target database.

Authors:  Ana Paula Carregal; Flávia V Maciel; Juliano B Carregal; Bianca Dos Reis Santos; Alisson Marques da Silva; Alex G Taranto
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Dimethylaminophenyl Hydrazides as Inhibitors of the Lipid Transport Protein LprG in Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Lu Bai; Lia A Parkin; Hong Zhang; Rebecca Shum; Mary L Previti; Jessica C Seeliger
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.084

9.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance.

Authors:  William J Allen; Trent E Balius; Sudipto Mukherjee; Scott R Brozell; Demetri T Moustakas; P Therese Lang; David A Case; Irwin D Kuntz; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Choosing the Optimal Rigid Receptor for Docking and Scoring in the CSAR 2013/2014 Experiment.

Authors:  Matthew P Baumgartner; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.