Literature DB >> 18781587

In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: pruning ensembles of receptor structures for increased efficiency and accuracy during docking.

Erin S D Bolstad1, Amy C Anderson.   

Abstract

Representing receptors as ensembles of protein conformations during docking is a powerful method to approximate protein flexibility and increase the accuracy of the resulting ranked list of compounds. Unfortunately, docking compounds against a large number of ensemble members can increase computational cost and time investment. In this article, we present an efficient method to evaluate and select the most contributive ensemble members prior to docking for targets with a conserved core of residues that bind a ligand moiety. We observed that ensemble members that preserve the geometry of the active site core are most likely to place ligands in the active site with a conserved orientation, generally rank ligands correctly and increase interactions with the receptor. A relative distance approach is used to quantify the preservation of the three-dimensional interatomic distances of the conserved ligand-binding atoms and prune large ensembles quickly. In this study, we investigate dihydrofolate reductase as an example of a protein with a conserved core; however, this method for accurately selecting relevant ensemble members a priori can be applied to any system with a conserved ligand-binding core, including HIV-1 protease, kinases, and acetylcholinesterase. Representing a drug target as a pruned ensemble during in silico screening should increase the accuracy and efficiency of high-throughput analyses of lead analogs. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18781587      PMCID: PMC2649978          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  56 in total

1.  The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase.

Authors:  C W Murray; C A Baxter; A D Frenkel
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Developing a dynamic pharmacophore model for HIV-1 integrase.

Authors:  H A Carlson; K M Masukawa; K Rubins; F D Bushman; W L Jorgensen; R D Lins; J M Briggs; J A McCammon
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Geno3D: automatic comparative molecular modelling of protein.

Authors:  Christophe Combet; Martin Jambon; Gilbert Deléage; Christophe Geourjon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Protein flexibility and drug design: how to hit a moving target.

Authors:  Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  ESyPred3D: Prediction of proteins 3D structures.

Authors:  Christophe Lambert; Nadia Léonard; Xavier De Bolle; Eric Depiereux
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  Complexity and simplicity of ligand-macromolecule interactions: the energy landscape perspective.

Authors:  Gennady M Verkhivker; Djamal Bouzida; Daniel K Gehlhaar; Paul A Rejto; Stephan T Freer; Peter W Rose
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Dicyclic and tricyclic diaminopyrimidine derivatives as potent inhibitors of Cryptosporidium parvum dihydrofolate reductase: structure-activity and structure-selectivity correlations.

Authors:  R G Nelson; A Rosowsky
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Studying enzyme binding specificity in acetylcholinesterase using a combined molecular dynamics and multiple docking approach.

Authors:  Jeremy Kua; Yingkai Zhang; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Atomic structures of human dihydrofolate reductase complexed with NADPH and two lipophilic antifolates at 1.09 a and 1.05 a resolution.

Authors:  Anthony E Klon; Annie Héroux; Larry J Ross; Vibha Pathak; Cheryl A Johnson; James R Piper; David W Borhani
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Two crystal structures of dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase from Cryptosporidium hominis reveal protein-ligand interactions including a structural basis for observed antifolate resistance.

Authors:  Amy C Anderson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2005-02-08
View more
  12 in total

1.  Utilizing experimental data for reducing ensemble size in flexible-protein docking.

Authors:  Mengang Xu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations.

Authors:  Markus A Lill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Induced fit docking, and the use of QM/MM methods in docking.

Authors:  Mengang Xu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Technol       Date:  2013-09

4.  How to choose relevant multiple receptor conformations for virtual screening: a test case of Cdk2 and normal mode analysis.

Authors:  Olivier Sperandio; Liliane Mouawad; Eulalie Pinto; Bruno O Villoutreix; David Perahia; Maria A Miteva
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  2,4-Diamino-5-(2'-arylpropargyl)pyrimidine derivatives as new nonclassical antifolates for human dihydrofolate reductase inhibition.

Authors:  Oztekin Algul; Janet L Paulsen; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.518

6.  Scoring ensembles of docked protein:ligand interactions for virtual lead optimization.

Authors:  Janet L Paulsen; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Structure-based approach to the development of potent and selective inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase from cryptosporidium.

Authors:  David B Bolstad; Erin S D Bolstad; Kathleen M Frey; Dennis L Wright; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 8.  Protein flexibility in docking and surface mapping.

Authors:  Katrina W Lexa; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 5.318

9.  A comparative study of AutoDock and PMF scoring performances, and SAR of 2-substituted pyrazolotriazolopyrimidines and 4-substituted pyrazolopyrimidines as potent xanthine oxidase inhibitors.

Authors:  Hamed I Ali; Takayuki Fujita; Eiichi Akaho; Tomohisa Nagamatsu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Conformational transitions upon ligand binding: holo-structure prediction from apo conformations.

Authors:  Daniel Seeliger; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.