Literature DB >> 9261575

Bilateral activation of fronto-parietal networks by incrementing demand in a working memory task.

T Klingberg1, B T O'Sullivan, P E Roland.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is known to activate the prefrontal cortex. In the present study we hypothesized that when additional contingencies are added to the instruction of a WM task, this would increase the WM load and result in the activation of additional prefrontal areas. With positron emission tomography we measured regional cerebral blood flow in nine subjects performing a control task and two delayed matching to sample tasks, in which the subjects were matching colours and patterns to a reference picture. The second of the two delayed matching tasks had a more complex instruction than the first, with additional contingencies of how to alternate between the matching of colours and patterns. This task thus required the subjects not only to remember a stimulus to match but also to perform this matching according to a specified plan. Both delayed matching tasks activated cortical fields in the middle frontal gyrus, the frontal operculum, upper cingulate gyrus, inferior parietal cortex and cortex lining the intraparietal sulcus, all in the left hemisphere. When alternated delayed matching was compared to simple delayed matching, increases were located in the right superior and middle frontal gyrus and the right anterior inferior parietal cortex. The increased demand during alternated matching thus resulted in bilateral activation of both dorsolateral prefrontal and inferior parietal cortex. The area in the inferior parietal cortex has previously been coactivated with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in several WM tasks, irrespective of the sensory modality of the stimuli, and during tasks involving planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9261575     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/7.5.465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  50 in total

1.  Differential neural responses during performance of matching and nonmatching to sample tasks at two delay intervals.

Authors:  R Elliott; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  What have Klingon letters and faces in common? An fMRI study on content-specific working memory systems.

Authors:  A Mecklinger; V Bosch; C Gruenewald; S Bentin; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Modulation and task effects in auditory processing measured using fMRI.

Authors:  D A Hall; M P Haggard; M A Akeroyd; A Q Summerfield; A R Palmer; M R Elliott; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Functional neuroanatomy of visuo-spatial working memory in Turner syndrome.

Authors:  M F Haberecht; V Menon; I S Warsofsky; C D White; J Dyer-Friedman; G H Glover; E K Neely; A L Reiss
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The functional neuroanatomy of temporal discrimination.

Authors:  Maria A Pastor; Brian L Day; Emiliano Macaluso; Karl J Friston; Richard S J Frackowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  White matter in aging and cognition: a cross-sectional study of microstructure in adults aged eighteen to eighty-three.

Authors:  Barbara B Bendlin; Michele E Fitzgerald; Michele L Ries; Guofan Xu; Erik K Kastman; Brent W Thiel; Howard A Rowley; Mariana Lazar; Andrew L Alexander; Sterling C Johnson
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Abnormal brain activation during working memory in children with prenatal exposure to drugs of abuse: the effects of methamphetamine, alcohol, and polydrug exposure.

Authors:  Florence F Roussotte; Jennifer E Bramen; S Christopher Nunez; Lorna C Quandt; Lynne Smith; Mary J O'Connor; Susan Y Bookheimer; Elizabeth R Sowell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Mechanisms underlying age- and performance-related differences in working memory.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Hyemi Chong; Xue Sun; Elise C Tarbi; Jenna L Riis; Scott M McGinnis; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Striatal dopamine influences the default mode network to affect shifting between object features.

Authors:  Linh C Dang; Aneesh Donde; Cindee Madison; James P O'Neil; William J Jagust
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.